H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Iva Budarova vs Joanne Russell H2H: 1-2
Joanne Russell holds a 2–1 lead over Iva Budarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Joanne Russell leads 2–0 on carpet, while Iva Budarova leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Joanne Russell won the 1984 Dallas third round 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 1984* | Dallas | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Joanne Russell | 6-2 7-6 | Iva Budarova | Match data |
| Aug 3, 1983* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Iva Budarova | 7-5 6-3 | Joanne Russell | Match data |
| Oct 29, 1982* | Brighton | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Joanne Russell | 7-6 4-6 6-2 | Iva Budarova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iva Budarova | #661 | #25 | 9 | 1,859 | 148 | 206 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Joanne Russell | — | — | — | 1,935 | 203 | 199 | 50.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Iva Budarova | Joanne Russell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1978 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1979 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 3 | 1973 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 1974 | 5–2 | 71.4% | — | 1,582 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1981 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 3 | 1975 | 17–12 | 58.6% | — | 1,693 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 1976 | 16–14 | 53.3% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1983 | 33–23 | 58.9% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 19–16 | 54.3% | — | 1,884 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1984 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 13–16 | 44.8% | — | 1,859 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1985 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,727 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 1986 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,872 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 1987 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 27–23 | 54.0% | — | 1,809 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1988 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #105 | 1,586 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 20–22 | 47.6% | — | 1,825 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 11–11 | 50.0% | — | 1,797 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #186 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 27–17 | 61.4% | — | 1,838 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 7–20 | 25.9% | — | 1,613 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–10 | 16.7% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,514 | 0 | 5 |