H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Iva Budarova vs Larisa Savchenko H2H: 3-0
Iva Budarova holds a 3–0 lead over Larisa Savchenko in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Iva Budarova leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Iva Budarova won the 1985 Mahwah third round 6-4 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TCH
Age 65
Left-Handed
H2H
3
–
0
3 main draw meetings
URS
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 15, 1985* | Mahwah | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Iva Budarova | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
| Aug 5, 1985 | Toronto | WTA 250 | R64 | Hard | Iva Budarova | 6-2 1-6 7-5 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
| Apr 10, 1985* | Hilton Head | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Iva Budarova | 6-2 1-6 6-1 | Larisa Savchenko | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iva Budarova | #661 | #25 | 9 | 1,859 | 148 | 206 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Larisa Savchenko | #305 | #13 | 454 | 1,926 | 238 | 239 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Iva Budarova | Larisa Savchenko | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #138 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 15–17 | 46.9% | #55 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #36 | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 23–14 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 |
| 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #16 | 1,861 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 33–23 | 58.9% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,887 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #91 | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,727 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 19–16 | 54.3% | #48 | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 18–18 | 50.0% | #58 | 1,728 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #33 | 1,755 | 0 | 2 |
| 1988 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #105 | 1,586 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #41 | 1,809 | 0 | 2 |
| 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #99 | 1,651 | 0 | 2 |
| 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #186 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #61 | 1,669 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #87 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #73 | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #210 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |