H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Iva Budarova vs Laura Arraya H2H: 2-1
Iva Budarova holds a 2–1 lead over Laura Arraya in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Iva Budarova leads 2–0 on clay, while Laura Arraya leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Iva Budarova won the 1985 Seabrook Island third round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TCH
Age 65
Left-Handed
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 1985* | Seabrook Island | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Iva Budarova | 6-4 6-4 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
| Feb 2, 1984* | Houston | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Laura Arraya | 6-3 7-6 | Iva Budarova | Match data |
| Feb 1, 1983* | Palm Beach | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Iva Budarova | 6-0 6-4 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iva Budarova | #661 | #25 | 9 | 1,859 | 148 | 206 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Iva Budarova | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1978 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1979 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 |
| 20 | 1981 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1983 | 33–23 | 58.9% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1984 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1985 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,727 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1986 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1987 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1988 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #105 | 1,586 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #186 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 |