H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Iva Budarova vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 0-3

Lori Mcneil holds a 3–0 lead over Iva Budarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Lori Mcneil leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1988 US Open round of 128 6-4 6-0.

TCH Age 66 Left-Handed
H2H
0 – 3
3 main-draw meetings
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lori Mcneil #9 6-4 6-0 Iva Budarova #98 Match data Aug 31, 1988* R128 US Open Grand Slam Hard
Lori Mcneil #11 6-4 6-0 Iva Budarova #135 Match data Oct 15, 1987* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 500 Carpet
Lori Mcneil #14 1-6 6-0 6-1 Iva Budarova #109 Match data Nov 14, 1986* R32 San Juan WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Iva Budarova — #25 9 1,866 150 207 42.0% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Lori Mcneil — #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 1 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Iva Budarova Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1977 1–1 50.0% — 1,510 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1978 4–6 40.0% — 1,512 0 0 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1979 15–13 53.6% — 1,656 0 3 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1980 5–9 35.7% — 1,615 0 3 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,568 0 1
20 1981 2–14 12.5% — 1,549 0 3 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1
21 1982 14–19 42.4% — 1,657 0 3 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1983 33–23 58.9% — 1,738 0 3 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1984 18–22 45.0% #56 1,705 0 3 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3
24 1985 19–23 45.2% — 1,726 0 3 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5
25 1986 11–24 31.4% #112 1,587 0 3 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 1987 6–14 30.0% #116 1,563 0 3 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6
27 1988 12–18 40.0% #105 1,585 0 3 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 1989 7–14 33.3% #141 1,560 0 3 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 1990 3–7 30.0% #186 1,535 0 3 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 — — — — — — — 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,671 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Iva Budarova Lori Mcneil
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1977 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1978 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1980 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1983 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 2 8 10 20.0% 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1982 8 5 13 61.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 1983 12 6 18 66.7% 16 9 25 64.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1%
23 1984 4 5 9 44.4% 10 9 19 52.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4%
24 1985 9 11 20 45.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 1986 5 10 15 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 8 9 11.1% 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
26 1987 0 4 4 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 1988 2 4 6 33.3% 9 11 20 45.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
28 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7%
29 1990 — — — — 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 40 50 90 44.4% 72 88 160 45.0% 11 19 30 36.7% 15 46 61 24.6% — 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Iva Budarova Lori Mcneil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1977 1510 106.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — +0.13 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17
17 1978 1513 115.7 — — — — — +54 — 50.0% +0.27 1–5 (17%) 1–2 (33%) 94.8 +0.69 1981 1521 104.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.24
18 1979 1656 127.5 — — — — -71 -92 — 55.9% +0.54 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) 98.2 +1.35 1982 1503 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.35
19 1980 1615 110.5 — — — — -119 -11 — 36.7% -0.77 1–1 0–1 — +0.90 1983 1569 107.2 — — — — +44 — — 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +1.06
20 1981 1550 124.3 — — — — -16 -7 — 26.3% -1.76 0–6 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 91.3 -0.75 1984 1609 115.3 — — — — +12 -55 +9 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.32
21 1982 1658 131.0 — — — — +17 -187 -105 43.2% -0.34 4–6 (40%) 2–6 (25%) 97.4 +0.59 1985 1588 118.5 — — — — +21 -104 +4 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.4 -0.23
22 1983 1739 136.1 — — — — +19 +32 -171 58.1% +0.11 5–6 (45%) 6–3 (67%) 104.6 -0.09 1986 1885 145.0 — — — — -9 -342 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) 109.2 +1.25
23 1984 1706 131.1 — — — — -7 +55 -61 45.1% -0.77 1–3 (25%) 5–5 (50%) 97.5 -1.34 1987 2007 158.5 — — — — +54 -354 -204 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 109.8 -0.70
24 1985 1726 124.5 — — — — +18 -60 — 46.5% -0.41 7–10 (41%) 6–8 (43%) 95.6 +0.23 1988 1902 142.7 — — — — +35 -186 +38 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) 105.0 +1.98
25 1986 1588 118.5 — — — — -46 +59 +65 39.2% -0.60 0–9 (0%) 3–7 (30%) 87.6 +0.40 1989 1761 134.8 — — — — +59 -79 +78 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 96.3 -0.28
26 1987 1564 120.2 — — — — -91 +95 — 36.4% -0.77 0–4 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 93.7 -0.47 1990 1696 135.0 — — — — +13 -75 +199 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) 90.4 -0.80
27 1988 1586 124.9 — — — — -129 +83 — 44.3% -1.01 3–7 (30%) 6–3 (67%) 99.0 +0.10 1991 1870 151.1 — — — — +12 -241 +44 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) 104.2 -0.74
28 1989 1560 109.4 — — — — — +59 — 36.2% -1.30 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.49 1992 1962 156.9 — — — — -4 -303 +75 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) 96.7 -0.46
29 1990 1535 102.8 — — — — — +28 — 33.3% -1.71 0–1 1–0 — +0.15 1993 1899 147.7 — — — — -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 -0.38
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1872 146.0 — — — — -59 -207 +243 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 98.9 -0.52
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1805 142.2 — — — — -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) 91.4 -0.26
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1727 130.2 — — — — -12 — +385 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 -0.48
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1656 120.2 — — — — +31 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 — -1.12
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1719 129.4 — — — — +1 -154 +310 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.58
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1671 99.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
Career — 1867 130.7 — — — — -22 +23 -90 44.8% -0.52 26–64 (29%) 35–46 (43%) 86.0 +0.67 — 2025 149.3 — — — — +13 -213 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.