H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Iva Budarova vs Mareen Louie Harper H2H: 3-0
Iva Budarova holds a 3–0 lead over Mareen Louie Harper in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Iva Budarova leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Iva Budarova won the 1983 Oakland third round 7-6 2-6 3-2 RET.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 1983* | Oakland | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Iva Budarova | 7-6 2-6 3-2 (ret.) | Mareen Louie Harper | Match data |
| Feb 12, 1983* | Indianapolis Indoors | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Iva Budarova | 6-4 6-4 | Mareen Louie Harper | Match data |
| Aug 17, 1982* | Montreal | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Iva Budarova | 7-5 6-3 | Mareen Louie Harper | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iva Budarova | #661 | #25 | 9 | 1,859 | 148 | 206 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Mareen Louie Harper | — | — | — | 1,911 | 177 | 239 | 42.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Iva Budarova | Mareen Louie Harper | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1977 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1978 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1978 | 7–12 | 36.8% | — | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1979 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 4–13 | 23.5% | — | 1,567 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 22–23 | 48.9% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 16–20 | 44.4% | — | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 9–18 | 33.3% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 33–23 | 58.9% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 7–10 | 41.2% | — | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1984 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1985 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,727 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 29–18 | 61.7% | — | 1,777 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1986 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,680 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1987 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 9–16 | 36.0% | — | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1988 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #105 | 1,586 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 12–17 | 41.4% | — | 1,614 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 6–14 | 30.0% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #186 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,591 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 12–16 | 42.9% | — | 1,615 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 1–7 | 12.5% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 2 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 2 |