H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Iva Budarova vs Nicole Jagerman H2H: 0-1
Nicole Jagerman holds a 1–0 lead over Iva Budarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nicole Jagerman leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Nicole Jagerman won the 1986 Hilversum third round 3-6 7-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TCH
Age 65
Left-Handed
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
NED
Age 58
Right-Handed
179 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 2, 1986* | Hilversum | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Nicole Jagerman | 3-6 7-6 6-3 | Iva Budarova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iva Budarova | #661 | #25 | 9 | 1,859 | 148 | 206 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Nicole Jagerman | #685 | #43 | 24 | 1,736 | 79 | 99 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Iva Budarova | Nicole Jagerman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1978 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1979 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 9–4 | 69.2% | #106 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 0–10 | 0.0% | #206 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1981 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #72 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #82 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1983 | 33–23 | 58.9% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #68 | 1,698 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1984 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1985 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,727 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #115 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1986 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #68 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1987 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #137 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1988 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #105 | 1,586 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #215 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #186 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |