H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Iva Budarova vs Patricia Hy Boulais H2H: 2-0
Iva Budarova holds a 2–0 lead over Patricia Hy Boulais in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Iva Budarova leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Iva Budarova won the 1990 Roland Garros first round 6-2 7-6(2).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TCH
Age 65
Left-Handed
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Age 60
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 1990* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Iva Budarova | 6-2 7-6(2) | Patricia Hy Boulais | Match data |
| May 20, 1987* | Geneva | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Iva Budarova | 6-1 6-0 | Patricia Hy Boulais | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iva Budarova | #661 | #25 | 9 | 1,859 | 148 | 206 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Patricia Hy Boulais | — | — | — | 1,907 | 140 | 163 | 46.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Iva Budarova | Patricia Hy Boulais | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1978 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1979 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1981 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 3 | 1986 | 8–1 | 88.9% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 1987 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,594 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1983 | 33–23 | 58.9% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 0–5 | 0.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1984 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,500 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1985 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,727 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,565 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1986 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 18–17 | 51.4% | — | 1,702 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1987 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,878 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1988 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #105 | 1,586 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 21–15 | 58.3% | — | 1,852 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 15–16 | 48.4% | — | 1,756 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #186 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 11–14 | 44.0% | — | 1,691 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 9–15 | 37.5% | — | 1,678 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 12–19 | 38.7% | — | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–8 | 11.1% | — | 1,571 | 0 | 1 |