H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Iva Budarova vs Petra Delhees Jauch H2H: 0-2
Petra Delhees Jauch holds a 2–0 lead over Iva Budarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Petra Delhees Jauch leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Petra Delhees Jauch won the 1985 Palm Beach fourth round 7-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 1985* | Palm Beach | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Petra Delhees Jauch | 7-6 6-1 | Iva Budarova | Match data |
| Jul 7, 1983* | Hittfield | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Petra Delhees Jauch | 6-4 6-3 | Iva Budarova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iva Budarova | #661 | #25 | 9 | 1,859 | 148 | 206 | 41.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Petra Delhees Jauch | — | — | — | 1,720 | 69 | 91 | 43.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Iva Budarova | Petra Delhees Jauch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,510 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 1978 | 4–6 | 40.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 1979 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 3 | 1977 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,606 | 0 | 3 | 1978 | 6–6 | 50.0% | — | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 2–14 | 12.5% | — | 1,544 | 0 | 3 | 1979 | 12–8 | 60.0% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 1 |
| 1982 | 14–19 | 42.4% | — | 1,656 | 0 | 3 | 1980 | 5–12 | 29.4% | — | 1,580 | 0 | 1 |
| 1983 | 33–23 | 58.9% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 3 | 1981 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 1 |
| 1984 | 18–22 | 45.0% | #56 | 1,705 | 0 | 3 | 1982 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 1985 | 19–23 | 45.2% | #68 | 1,727 | 0 | 3 | 1983 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,674 | 0 | 1 |
| 1986 | 11–24 | 31.4% | #112 | 1,587 | 0 | 3 | 1984 | 4–9 | 30.8% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 1 |
| 1987 | 6–14 | 30.0% | #116 | 1,563 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,705 | 0 | 1 |
| 1988 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #105 | 1,586 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #141 | 1,560 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1990 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #186 | 1,534 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |