H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Iva Budarova vs Sandra Cecchini H2H: 0-2

Sandra Cecchini holds a 2–0 lead over Iva Budarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sandra Cecchini leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Sandra Cecchini won the 1990 Kitzbuhel quarterfinal 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Iva Budarova
TCH Age 66 Left-Handed
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Sandra Cecchini
ITA Age 61 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sandra Cecchini #24 6-3 6-1 Iva Budarova #177 Match data Sep 15, 1990* QF Kitzbuhel Tier V → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay
Sandra Cecchini #19 3-6 6-1 6-0 Iva Budarova #121 Match data Apr 7, 1988* R32 Hilton Head Category 5 → modern equivalent WTA 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Iva Budarova #661 #25 9 1,865 148 206 41.8% 0 0 0 0 3 3
Sandra Cecchini #487 #15 279 1,936 300 217 58.0% 0 0 0 2 9 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Iva Budarova Sandra Cecchini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1977 1–1 50.0% — 1,510 0 0 1981 0–2 0.0% — 1,477 0 0
17 1978 4–6 40.0% — 1,513 0 0 1982 2–2 50.0% — 1,484 0 0
18 1979 15–13 53.6% — 1,656 0 3 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,496 0 0
19 1980 3–8 27.3% — 1,606 0 3 1984 17–15 53.1% #49 1,651 0 1
20 1981 2–14 12.5% — 1,544 0 3 1985 22–19 53.7% #49 1,746 0 2
21 1982 14–19 42.4% — 1,655 0 3 1986 15–19 44.1% #73 1,633 0 3
22 1983 33–23 58.9% — 1,737 0 3 1987 36–16 69.2% #18 1,859 0 5
23 1984 18–22 45.0% #56 1,705 0 3 1988 34–15 69.4% #21 1,843 0 7
24 1985 19–23 45.2% #68 1,725 0 3 1989 28–15 65.1% #26 1,798 0 8
25 1986 11–24 31.4% #112 1,587 0 3 1990 26–14 65.0% #20 1,814 0 9
26 1987 6–14 30.0% #116 1,563 0 3 1991 22–13 62.9% #27 1,773 0 10
27 1988 12–18 40.0% #105 1,585 0 3 1992 24–16 60.0% #34 1,823 0 11
28 1989 7–14 33.3% #141 1,560 0 3 1993 18–15 54.5% #56 1,726 0 11
29 1990 3–7 30.0% #186 1,535 0 3 1994 28–16 63.6% #33 1,840 0 11
30 — — — — — — — 1995 9–14 39.1% #108 1,661 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1996 10–10 50.0% #80 1,628 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1997 4–7 36.4% #206 1,608 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1998 4–8 33.3% #200 1,555 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Iva Budarova Sandra Cecchini
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1977 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1981 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 1978 — — — — 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
18 1979 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1983 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
19 1980 — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1984 12 4 16 75.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1981 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — 2 8 10 20.0% 1985 6 7 13 46.2% 15 8 23 65.2% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
21 1982 8 5 13 61.5% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 4 5 20.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 1986 2 4 6 33.3% 12 9 21 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 5 6 16.7%
22 1983 12 6 18 66.7% 16 9 25 64.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 4 6 33.3% 1987 8 4 12 66.7% 26 10 36 72.2% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
23 1984 4 5 9 44.4% 10 9 19 52.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 29 8 37 78.4% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
24 1985 9 11 20 45.0% 8 9 17 47.1% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1989 1 2 3 33.3% 26 12 38 68.4% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
25 1986 5 10 15 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 8 9 11.1% 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 1987 0 4 4 0.0% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 21 9 30 70.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1988 2 4 6 33.3% 9 11 20 45.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 21 11 32 65.6% — — — — 3 3 6 50.0%
28 1989 0 2 2 0.0% 6 11 17 35.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1993 3 3 6 50.0% 15 10 25 60.0% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
29 1990 — — — — 3 7 10 30.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 3 2 5 60.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 3 11 72.7%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 0 3 3 0.0% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 — — — — 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 0 1 1 0.0% 4 7 11 36.4% — — — — — — — —
Career — 40 50 90 44.4% 72 88 160 45.0% 11 19 30 36.7% 13 45 58 22.4% — 40 42 82 48.8% 236 140 376 62.8% 3 8 11 27.3% 21 26 47 44.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Iva Budarova Sandra Cecchini
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1977 1510 106.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 0–1 — +0.18 1981 1478 96.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — -0.07
17 1978 1513 115.7 — — — — — +53 — 50.0% +0.27 1–5 (17%) 1–2 (33%) 94.8 +0.82 1982 1484 101.9 — — — — — +37 — 44.4% +0.11 1–0 — — +0.65
18 1979 1656 127.4 — — — — -72 -92 — 55.9% +0.54 2–3 (40%) 2–4 (33%) 98.2 +1.40 1983 1497 106.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% 0.00 0–1 — — +0.17
19 1980 1606 110.0 — — — — -135 -3 — 30.4% -1.22 0–1 0–1 — +0.09 1984 1651 123.3 — — — — +49 -79 -56 53.9% +0.38 5–7 (42%) 1–3 (25%) 96.6 +2.06
20 1981 1544 124.3 — — — — -25 -1 — 26.3% -1.76 0–6 (0%) 0–3 (0%) 91.4 -0.73 1985 1747 132.3 — — — — -80 +43 — 51.1% -0.19 8–4 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 109.7 +0.71
21 1982 1656 130.8 — — — — +11 -185 -104 43.2% -0.34 4–6 (40%) 2–6 (25%) 97.5 +0.57 1986 1633 120.0 — — — — -65 +149 — 43.2% -0.53 4–4 (50%) 0–3 (0%) 96.0 +0.42
22 1983 1738 135.9 — — — — +16 +32 -170 58.1% +0.11 5–6 (45%) 6–3 (67%) 104.6 +0.07 1987 1859 148.1 — — — — -141 +79 — 66.7% +1.10 7–6 (54%) 6–2 (75%) 103.4 +0.44
23 1984 1705 131.0 — — — — -9 +55 -62 45.1% -0.77 1–3 (25%) 5–5 (50%) 97.5 -1.48 1988 1843 145.8 — — — — -149 +157 — 64.2% +1.10 9–2 (82%) 5–2 (71%) 107.7 +2.46
24 1985 1726 124.4 — — — — +16 -61 — 46.5% -0.41 7–10 (41%) 6–8 (43%) 95.6 +0.03 1989 1799 128.9 — — — — -134 +134 — 59.4% +0.59 13–7 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 99.8 +3.27
25 1986 1587 118.4 — — — — -46 +60 +65 39.2% -0.60 0–9 (0%) 3–7 (30%) 87.6 +0.10 1990 1815 140.5 — — — — -136 +130 — 60.0% +0.83 10–5 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 103.3 +0.82
26 1987 1563 120.1 — — — — -91 +96 — 36.4% -0.77 0–4 (0%) 1–2 (33%) 93.7 -0.56 1991 1774 131.6 — — — — -138 +151 — 61.3% +0.68 5–4 (56%) 2–2 (50%) 100.3 +1.96
27 1988 1586 124.9 — — — — -130 +82 — 44.3% -1.01 3–7 (30%) 6–3 (67%) 99.0 +0.16 1992 1824 136.5 — — — — -222 +141 — 55.6% +0.29 8–2 (80%) 4–2 (67%) 107.8 +0.11
28 1989 1560 109.4 — — — — — +59 — 36.2% -1.30 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.54 1993 1727 129.9 — — — — -151 +131 — 53.9% +0.20 5–5 (50%) 7–1 (88%) 101.3 -0.35
29 1990 1535 102.8 — — — — — +28 — 33.3% -1.71 0–1 1–0 — +0.15 1994 1841 138.9 — — — — -123 +6 — 57.0% +0.51 14–5 (74%) 1–5 (17%) 101.9 +0.57
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1661 113.4 — — — — +36 +34 — 40.7% -0.54 4–4 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 95.9 +0.31
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1629 109.5 — — — — +14 +62 — 52.4% +0.05 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +1.57
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1608 106.4 — — — — — +32 — 39.1% -1.30 0–1 2–0 — -0.39
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1555 95.4 — — — — — +15 — 34.6% -1.00 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — +0.33
Career — 1866 130.7 — — — — -23 +24 -90 44.7% -0.54 25–64 (28%) 35–46 (43%) 85.7 +0.38 — 1936 137.9 — — — — -93 +97 -56 55.5% +0.35 98–62 (61%) 42–34 (55%) 106.0 +2.91

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.