H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Iva Jovic vs Taylor Townsend H2H: 1-0
Iva Jovic holds a 1–0 lead over Taylor Townsend in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Iva Jovic leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Iva Jovic won the 2026 Rome third round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 18
Right-Handed
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 30
Left-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2026 | Rome | WTA 1000 | R32 | Clay | Iva Jovic | 7-5 6-2 | Taylor Townsend | Match data |
| Mar 4, 2024 | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | Q1 | Hard | Taylor Townsend | 6-1 6-2 | Iva Jovic | Match data |
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iva Jovic | #16 | #16 | 2,636 | 1,945 | 44 | 25 | 63.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Taylor Townsend | #80 | #46 | 1,267 | 1,859 | 68 | 85 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Iva Jovic | Taylor Townsend | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 2024 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #189 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 2025 | 14–10 | 58.3% | #35 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 | 2013 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #365 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2026 | 29–14 | 67.4% | #16 | 1,937 | 0 | 1 | 2014 | 5–6 | 45.5% | #104 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #309 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #135 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #94 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #90 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #81 | 1,683 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #89 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #133 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #81 | 1,740 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #68 | 1,787 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #117 | 1,828 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2026 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #80 | 1,814 | 0 | 0 |