H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Iva Majoli vs Angelica Gavaldon H2H: 0-1
Angelica Gavaldon holds a 1–0 lead over Iva Majoli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Angelica Gavaldon leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Angelica Gavaldon won the 1995 Wimbledon first round 1-6 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 52
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 1995* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Angelica Gavaldon | 1-6 6-3 6-1 | Iva Majoli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iva Majoli | #777 | #4 | 3,406 | 2,157 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 |
| Angelica Gavaldon | #434 | #34 | 237 | 1,733 | 72 | 109 | 39.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Iva Majoli | Angelica Gavaldon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #50 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #264 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1993 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #191 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,922 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #51 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1995 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #9 | 2,046 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #242 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1996 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 2,040 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #142 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,947 | 1 | 7 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #64 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,828 | 1 | 7 | 1994 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #119 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #164 | 1,694 | 1 | 7 | 1995 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #36 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,703 | 1 | 7 | 1996 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #219 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,697 | 1 | 7 | 1997 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #107 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #32 | 1,668 | 1 | 8 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #697 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #131 | 1,589 | 1 | 8 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #379 | 1,510 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #321 | 1,564 | 1 | 8 | 2000 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #261 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |