H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Iva Majoli vs Elna Reinach H2H: 2-0
Iva Majoli holds a 2–0 lead over Elna Reinach in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Iva Majoli leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Iva Majoli won the 1994 US Open second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
RSA
Age 57
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 1994* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Iva Majoli | 6-2 6-2 | Elna Reinach | Match data |
| Nov 12, 1992* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Iva Majoli | 7-5 0-6 6-2 | Elna Reinach | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iva Majoli | #777 | #4 | 3,406 | 2,157 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 |
| Elna Reinach | #342 | #26 | 33 | 1,865 | 145 | 170 | 46.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Iva Majoli | Elna Reinach | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #50 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1993 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,922 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #205 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1995 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #9 | 2,046 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 14–12 | 53.8% | #56 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1996 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 2,040 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #95 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,947 | 1 | 7 | 1988 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #28 | 1,812 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,828 | 1 | 7 | 1989 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #56 | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #164 | 1,694 | 1 | 7 | 1990 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #90 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,703 | 1 | 7 | 1991 | 15–22 | 40.5% | #82 | 1,705 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,697 | 1 | 7 | 1992 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #109 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #32 | 1,668 | 1 | 8 | 1993 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,707 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2003 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #131 | 1,589 | 1 | 8 | 1994 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #74 | 1,731 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #321 | 1,564 | 1 | 8 | 1995 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,666 | 0 | 1 |