H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Iva Majoli vs Julie Halard-Decugis H2H: 0-3
Julie Halard-Decugis holds a 3–0 lead over Iva Majoli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Julie Halard-Decugis leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julie Halard-Decugis won the 1999 Manhattan Beach third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 55
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 12, 1999* | Manhattan Beach | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Julie Halard-Decugis | 6-1 6-4 | Iva Majoli | Match data |
| Feb 19, 1996* | Paris | WTA 500 | F | Clay | Julie Halard-Decugis | 7-5 7-6 | Iva Majoli | Match data |
| Oct 28, 1993* | Essen | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Julie Halard-Decugis | 6-4 4-6 6-3 | Iva Majoli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iva Majoli | #777 | #4 | 3,406 | 2,157 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 |
| Julie Halard-Decugis | #15 | #7 | 2,030 | 2,003 | 337 | 219 | 60.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 12 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Iva Majoli | Julie Halard-Decugis | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #50 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1993 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,922 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 9–5 | 64.3% | #62 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1995 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #9 | 2,046 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #75 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1996 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 2,040 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #118 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,947 | 1 | 7 | 1990 | 20–16 | 55.6% | #41 | 1,708 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,828 | 1 | 7 | 1991 | 44–23 | 65.7% | #20 | 1,821 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #164 | 1,694 | 1 | 7 | 1992 | 22–13 | 62.9% | #27 | 1,837 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 2000 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,703 | 1 | 7 | 1993 | 26–18 | 59.1% | #29 | 1,821 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2001 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,697 | 1 | 7 | 1994 | 38–21 | 64.4% | #21 | 1,890 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2002 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #32 | 1,668 | 1 | 8 | 1995 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #50 | 1,770 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2003 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #131 | 1,589 | 1 | 8 | 1996 | 28–10 | 73.7% | #20 | 1,856 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #321 | 1,564 | 1 | 8 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #178 | 1,843 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #22 | 1,917 | 0 | 8 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 47–22 | 68.1% | #9 | 1,920 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 29–23 | 55.8% | #15 | 1,829 | 0 | 12 |