H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Iva Majoli vs Laurence Courtois H2H: 1-0
Iva Majoli holds a 1–0 lead over Laurence Courtois in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Iva Majoli leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Iva Majoli won the 1997 Chicago fourth round 7-5 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 50
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 7, 1997* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Iva Majoli | 7-5 6-1 | Laurence Courtois | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iva Majoli | #777 | #4 | 3,406 | 2,157 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 |
| Laurence Courtois | #484 | #37 | 565 | 1,719 | 74 | 93 | 44.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Iva Majoli | Laurence Courtois | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #50 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1993 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,922 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1995 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #9 | 2,046 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #104 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1996 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 2,040 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #105 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,947 | 1 | 7 | 1995 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,828 | 1 | 7 | 1996 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #44 | 1,706 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #164 | 1,694 | 1 | 7 | 1997 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #183 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,703 | 1 | 7 | 1998 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #125 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,697 | 1 | 7 | 1999 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #78 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #32 | 1,668 | 1 | 8 | 2000 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #130 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #131 | 1,589 | 1 | 8 | 2001 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #166 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #321 | 1,564 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |