H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Iva Majoli vs Linda Wild H2H: 1-1
Iva Majoli and Linda Wild are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Iva Majoli won the 1994 Essen third round 6-7 7-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 1994* | Essen | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Iva Majoli | 6-7 7-6 7-6 | Linda Wild | Match data |
| Nov 14, 1992* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Linda Wild | 4-6 6-2 6-4 | Iva Majoli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iva Majoli | #777 | #4 | 3,406 | 2,157 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 |
| Linda Wild | #252 | #23 | 823 | 1,823 | 135 | 146 | 48.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Iva Majoli | Linda Wild | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #50 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1993 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,922 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1995 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #9 | 2,046 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1996 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 2,040 | 0 | 4 | 1989 | 1–7 | 12.5% | #155 | 1,457 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,947 | 1 | 7 | 1990 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #86 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,828 | 1 | 7 | 1991 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #41 | 1,720 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #164 | 1,694 | 1 | 7 | 1992 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #49 | 1,733 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,703 | 1 | 7 | 1993 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #45 | 1,764 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2001 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,697 | 1 | 7 | 1994 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #49 | 1,741 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2002 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #32 | 1,668 | 1 | 8 | 1995 | 17–13 | 56.7% | #58 | 1,758 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2003 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #131 | 1,589 | 1 | 8 | 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #29 | 1,817 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #321 | 1,564 | 1 | 8 | 1997 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #223 | 1,629 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #191 | 1,570 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,543 | 0 | 5 |