H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Iva Majoli vs Miriam Oremans H2H: 0-2

Miriam Oremans holds a 2–0 lead over Iva Majoli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Miriam Oremans leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Miriam Oremans won the 2001 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix round of 32 5-7 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Iva Majoli
CRO Age 49 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Miriam Oremans
NED Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Miriam Oremans #80 5-7 6-2 6-3 Iva Majoli #36 Match data Oct 11, 2001* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Miriam Oremans #65 7-5 6-1 Iva Majoli #21 Match data Oct 7, 1994* R16 Zurich Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Iva Majoli #777 #4 3,406 2,155 262 192 57.7% 1 3 0 4 0 8
Miriam Oremans #193 #25 585 1,808 162 182 47.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Iva Majoli Miriam Oremans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 1992 7–6 53.8% #50 1,624 0 0 — — — — — — —
15 1993 13–13 50.0% #46 1,735 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1994 38–19 66.7% #13 1,921 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1995 29–12 70.7% #9 2,045 0 2 1990 1–1 50.0% #185 1,519 0 0
18 1996 42–17 71.2% #7 2,038 0 4 1991 3–9 25.0% #149 1,472 0 0
19 1997 43–21 67.2% #6 1,946 1 7 1992 8–12 40.0% #130 1,531 0 0
20 1998 23–20 53.5% #25 1,828 1 7 1993 28–20 58.3% #31 1,746 0 0
21 1999 5–11 31.2% #164 1,694 1 7 1994 14–18 43.8% #48 1,733 0 0
22 2000 11–11 50.0% #62 1,695 1 7 1995 19–18 51.4% #42 1,768 0 0
23 2001 20–22 47.6% #44 1,697 1 7 1996 17–18 48.6% #46 1,714 0 0
24 2002 23–22 51.1% #32 1,667 1 8 1997 15–15 50.0% #46 1,773 0 0
25 2003 7–15 31.8% #131 1,606 1 8 1998 13–16 44.8% #57 1,728 0 0
26 2004 1–3 25.0% #321 1,579 1 8 1999 8–17 32.0% #98 1,627 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2000 17–13 56.7% #64 1,711 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 2001 13–15 46.4% #84 1,690 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2002 6–10 37.5% #124 1,613 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Iva Majoli Miriam Oremans
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 1992 3 4 7 42.9% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1993 4 6 10 40.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1994 16 7 23 69.6% 13 5 18 72.2% 2 2 4 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1995 14 3 17 82.4% 11 5 16 68.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1990 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1996 10 6 16 62.5% 15 6 21 71.4% 2 1 3 66.7% 15 4 19 78.9% 1991 2 5 7 28.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
19 1997 8 9 17 47.1% 19 4 23 82.6% 4 2 6 66.7% 12 6 18 66.7% 1992 6 6 12 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
20 1998 6 5 11 54.5% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 8 15 46.7% 1993 16 14 30 53.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
21 1999 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% 1994 5 9 14 35.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 2 5 60.0%
22 2000 5 5 10 50.0% 5 4 9 55.6% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% 1995 7 8 15 46.7% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2001 11 11 22 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 1996 2 6 8 25.0% 6 5 11 54.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 2002 7 12 19 36.8% 14 7 21 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 1997 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 3 8 62.5%
25 2003 0 6 6 0.0% 6 7 13 46.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 1 6 7 14.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
26 2004 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1999 2 7 9 22.2% 0 5 5 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 10 6 16 62.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1 4 5 20.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
Career — 85 81 166 51.2% 105 58 163 64.4% 11 10 21 52.4% 61 43 104 58.7% — 61 85 146 41.8% 28 43 71 39.4% 53 33 86 61.6% 20 21 41 48.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Iva Majoli Miriam Oremans
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 1992 1624 131.4 — — — — -1 -35 — 50.0% -0.17 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — -0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 1993 1736 154.2 — — — — -24 -82 — 51.7% +0.21 2–4 (33%) 2–3 (40%) 100.6 -0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1994 1922 155.6 — — — — -47 -71 -318 58.8% +0.37 18–6 (75%) 10–2 (83%) 116.4 -1.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1995 2046 165.8 — — — — 0 -128 — 66.7% +1.21 8–6 (57%) 8–2 (80%) 107.5 -0.04 1990 1520 110.3 — — — — — — — 40.0% -0.60 1–0 — — -0.11
18 1996 2038 166.9 — — — — +33 -42 -404 65.7% +0.63 13–8 (62%) 11–4 (73%) 105.7 -1.43 1991 1472 101.8 — — — — +51 +51 — 29.6% -1.00 1–2 (33%) — — +0.66
19 1997 1946 159.5 — — — — -16 +184 -241 60.5% +0.66 20–9 (69%) 10–9 (53%) 106.3 +1.31 1992 1532 111.4 — — — — +48 — -24 38.6% -0.80 3–1 (75%) 0–1 — +0.45
20 1998 1829 148.6 — — — — -4 +251 — 52.7% 0.00 6–5 (55%) 7–4 (64%) 99.1 -0.16 1993 1747 146.5 — — — — -74 -220 +26 59.1% +0.56 7–14 (33%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +0.65
21 1999 1694 121.9 — — — — +5 +287 — 35.1% -1.08 2–3 (40%) 0–1 — +0.20 1994 1733 131.3 — — — — -44 -192 +24 46.8% -0.26 5–8 (38%) 5–7 (42%) 96.7 +0.41
22 2000 1695 114.9 — — — — -4 +192 — 42.3% -0.77 8–2 (80%) 2–3 (40%) 102.6 -0.36 1995 1769 143.9 — — — — -10 -170 -22 50.0% +0.10 6–4 (60%) 6–7 (46%) 104.5 -0.91
23 2001 1697 138.2 — — — — +23 +107 — 49.5% -0.19 6–7 (46%) 6–7 (46%) 98.7 -0.47 1996 1714 134.9 — — — — -34 -67 +161 48.1% +0.09 5–4 (56%) 4–5 (44%) 100.2 +0.41
24 2002 1668 129.8 — — — — -45 +156 +61 51.9% -0.21 8–10 (44%) 6–4 (60%) 95.6 +0.77 1997 1774 137.0 — — — — -31 -189 +117 47.9% +0.10 8–7 (53%) 2–7 (22%) 99.3 -1.65
25 2003 1607 113.3 -3.85 -1.53 0.641 40.0% -55 +133 — 35.3% -1.04 5–4 (56%) 0–3 (0%) 96.9 -0.94 1998 1728 120.1 — — — — -72 -132 +210 41.5% -0.65 6–1 (86%) 5–7 (42%) 102.7 -0.25
26 2004 1579 102.6 — — — — -48 — — 33.3% -0.56 0–1 — — -0.23 1999 1628 117.1 — — — — -17 -126 +239 34.0% -1.19 1–2 (33%) 1–1 — -1.78
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1711 126.6 — — — — -8 -186 +166 53.5% +0.13 7–4 (64%) 4–3 (57%) 103.0 +0.23
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1690 122.8 — — — — -15 -187 +242 43.3% -0.55 8–3 (73%) 3–3 (50%) 101.2 -1.04
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1613 100.3 — — — — -1 -157 +280 40.0% -0.60 1–2 (33%) 0–4 (0%) 93.7 +0.42
Career — 2155 156.1 -3.85 -1.53 0.641 40.0% -9 +79 -234 55.0% +0.17 99–66 (60%) 62–43 (59%) 109.1 -0.75 — 1808 135.6 — — — — -26 -145 +138 46.8% -0.19 59–52 (53%) 34–51 (40%) 97.2 -0.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.