H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Iva Majoli vs Shi-Ting Wang H2H: 2-0
Iva Majoli holds a 2–0 lead over Shi-Ting Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Iva Majoli leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Iva Majoli won the 1997 Key Biscayne second round 6-4 1-6 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
TPE
Age 52
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 1997* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Iva Majoli | 6-4 1-6 7-6 | Shi-Ting Wang | Match data |
| Jun 4, 1995* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Iva Majoli | 7-5 6-2 | Shi-Ting Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iva Majoli | #777 | #4 | 3,406 | 2,157 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 |
| Shi-Ting Wang | #457 | #26 | 707 | 1,832 | 128 | 105 | 54.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Iva Majoli | Shi-Ting Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #50 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | 1993 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,922 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1995 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #9 | 2,046 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1996 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 2,040 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,947 | 1 | 7 | 1993 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1998 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,828 | 1 | 7 | 1994 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #42 | 1,775 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #164 | 1,694 | 1 | 7 | 1995 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #44 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2000 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,703 | 1 | 7 | 1996 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #40 | 1,805 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 2001 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,697 | 1 | 7 | 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,682 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2002 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #32 | 1,668 | 1 | 8 | 1998 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #58 | 1,642 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2003 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #131 | 1,589 | 1 | 8 | 1999 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,583 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #321 | 1,564 | 1 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |