H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Iva Majoli vs Silke Meier H2H: 1-0
Iva Majoli holds a 1–0 lead over Silke Meier in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Iva Majoli leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Iva Majoli won the 1996 Roland Garros first round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 58
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 1996* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Iva Majoli | 6-3 6-4 | Silke Meier | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iva Majoli | #777 | #4 | 3,406 | 2,157 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 |
| Silke Meier | #948 | #40 | 101 | 1,667 | 81 | 141 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Iva Majoli | Silke Meier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #50 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1993 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,922 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1995 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #9 | 2,046 | 0 | 2 | 1986 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1996 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 2,040 | 0 | 4 | 1987 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #50 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1997 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,947 | 1 | 7 | 1988 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1998 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,828 | 1 | 7 | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #164 | 1,694 | 1 | 7 | 1990 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #132 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2000 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,703 | 1 | 7 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #138 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2001 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,697 | 1 | 7 | 1992 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #80 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2002 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #32 | 1,668 | 1 | 8 | 1993 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #151 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2003 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #131 | 1,589 | 1 | 8 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #113 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #321 | 1,564 | 1 | 8 | 1995 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #91 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #205 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |