H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Iva Majoli vs Veronika Martinek H2H: 1-0
Iva Majoli holds a 1–0 lead over Veronika Martinek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Iva Majoli leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Iva Majoli won the 1995 Barcelona fourth round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 54
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 1995* | Barcelona | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Iva Majoli | 6-2 6-2 | Veronika Martinek | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iva Majoli | #777 | #4 | 3,406 | 2,157 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 |
| Veronika Martinek | #530 | #49 | 177 | 1,664 | 73 | 104 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Iva Majoli | Veronika Martinek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #50 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1993 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,922 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #116 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1995 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #9 | 2,046 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #160 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1996 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 2,040 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #54 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1997 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,947 | 1 | 7 | 1991 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #74 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1998 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,828 | 1 | 7 | 1992 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #61 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #164 | 1,694 | 1 | 7 | 1993 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #131 | 1,530 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2000 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,703 | 1 | 7 | 1994 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #86 | 1,570 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2001 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,697 | 1 | 7 | 1995 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #80 | 1,579 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2002 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #32 | 1,668 | 1 | 8 | 1996 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #143 | 1,489 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2003 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #131 | 1,589 | 1 | 8 | 1997 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #144 | 1,522 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #321 | 1,564 | 1 | 8 | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #465 | 1,505 | 0 | 1 |