H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Iva Majoli vs Zina Garrison H2H: 1-1
Iva Majoli and Zina Garrison are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Iva Majoli leads 1–0 on carpet, while Zina Garrison leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Iva Majoli won the 1996 Tokyo third round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 48
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 62
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 1, 1996* | Tokyo | WTA 1000 | R32 | Carpet | Iva Majoli | 6-2 6-4 | Zina Garrison | Match data |
| Apr 18, 1992* | Houston | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Zina Garrison | 6-3 6-4 | Iva Majoli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iva Majoli | #777 | #4 | 3,406 | 2,157 | 259 | 190 | 57.7% | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 |
| Zina Garrison | #318 | #4 | 134 | 2,142 | 581 | 268 | 68.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | 15 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Iva Majoli | Zina Garrison | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | 1992 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #50 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | 1993 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | 1994 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #13 | 1,922 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,529 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | 1995 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #9 | 2,046 | 0 | 2 | 1981 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1996 | 39–16 | 70.9% | #8 | 2,040 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 23–15 | 60.5% | — | 1,853 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 1997 | 43–21 | 67.2% | #6 | 1,947 | 1 | 7 | 1983 | 38–18 | 67.9% | — | 1,989 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1998 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #25 | 1,828 | 1 | 7 | 1984 | 47–20 | 70.1% | #9 | 2,012 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1999 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #164 | 1,694 | 1 | 7 | 1985 | 51–18 | 73.9% | #8 | 2,032 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 2000 | 11–10 | 52.4% | #62 | 1,703 | 1 | 7 | 1986 | 48–22 | 68.6% | #11 | 1,999 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2001 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #44 | 1,697 | 1 | 7 | 1987 | 44–17 | 72.1% | #9 | 1,987 | 0 | 7 |
| 24 | 2002 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #32 | 1,668 | 1 | 8 | 1988 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #9 | 2,021 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2003 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #131 | 1,589 | 1 | 8 | 1989 | 60–15 | 80.0% | #4 | 2,130 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 2004 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #321 | 1,564 | 1 | 8 | 1990 | 48–18 | 72.7% | #10 | 2,039 | 0 | 11 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 37–18 | 67.3% | #12 | 1,963 | 0 | 11 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 36–19 | 65.5% | #18 | 1,924 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 43–19 | 69.4% | #14 | 1,995 | 0 | 14 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,889 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 25–16 | 61.0% | #22 | 1,868 | 0 | 15 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #273 | 1,704 | 0 | 15 |