H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Jackie Fayter vs Iris Riedel Kuhn H2H: 2-3
Iris Riedel Kuhn holds a 3–2 lead over Jackie Fayter in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay. Most recently, Iris Riedel Kuhn won the 1978 Newcastle third round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 1978* | Newcastle | WTA 250 | R32 | — | Iris Riedel Kuhn | 6-1 6-1 | Jackie Fayter | Match data |
| May 12, 1977* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Iris Riedel Kuhn | 6-4 7-6 | Jackie Fayter | Match data |
| Aug 12, 1976* | Indianapolis | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Jackie Fayter | 6-4 6-0 | Iris Riedel Kuhn | Match data |
| Mar 15, 1975* | Alexandria | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Jackie Fayter | 3-6 6-4 7-5 | Iris Riedel Kuhn | Match data |
| Mar 8, 1975* | Cairo | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Iris Riedel Kuhn | 6-1 6-3 | Jackie Fayter | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jackie Fayter | — | — | — | 1,723 | 121 | 143 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Iris Riedel Kuhn | — | — | — | 1,845 | 104 | 96 | 52.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jackie Fayter | Iris Riedel Kuhn | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1968 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1969 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1970 | 4–13 | 23.5% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1971 | 15–21 | 41.7% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1972 | 22–20 | 52.4% | — | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 16–13 | 55.2% | — | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1973 | 17–29 | 37.0% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1974 | 24–17 | 58.5% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 13–14 | 48.1% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1975 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 13–10 | 56.5% | — | 1,694 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1976 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,685 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1977 | 10–8 | 55.6% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 28–9 | 75.7% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1978 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 15–13 | 53.6% | — | 1,734 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 1979 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 1–6 | 14.3% | — | 1,631 | 0 | 7 |