H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Jackie Fayter vs Laura Dupont H2H: 0-1

Laura Dupont holds a 1–0 lead over Jackie Fayter in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Laura Dupont leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Laura Dupont won the 1976 Atlanta round of 64 6-3 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jackie Fayter
GBR Age 75
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Laura Dupont
USA Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Laura Dupont 6-3 6-1 Jackie Fayter Match data Sep 15, 1976* R64 Atlanta WTA 250 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jackie Fayter — — — 1,721 121 143 45.8% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Laura Dupont — — — 1,895 216 244 47.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jackie Fayter Laura Dupont
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1968 1–1 50.0% — 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1969 1–3 25.0% — 1,511 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1970 4–13 23.5% — 1,458 0 0 1968 6–11 35.3% — 1,495 0 0
20 1971 15–21 41.7% — 1,562 0 0 1969 2–4 33.3% — 1,494 0 0
21 1972 22–20 52.4% — 1,631 0 0 1970 10–7 58.8% — 1,580 0 1
22 1973 17–29 37.0% — 1,549 0 0 1971 12–8 60.0% — 1,684 0 1
23 1974 24–17 58.5% — 1,664 0 2 1972 7–14 33.3% — 1,647 0 1
24 1975 10–6 62.5% — 1,687 0 2 1973 13–23 36.1% — 1,642 0 1
25 1976 6–11 35.3% — 1,632 0 2 1974 15–17 46.9% — 1,718 0 1
26 1977 10–8 55.6% — 1,652 0 4 1975 23–22 51.1% — 1,768 0 2
27 1978 10–12 45.5% — 1,607 0 4 1976 25–19 56.8% — 1,820 0 3
28 1979 1–2 33.3% — 1,591 0 4 1977 28–22 56.0% — 1,839 0 5
29 — — — — — — — 1978 24–25 49.0% — 1,730 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1979 22–20 52.4% — 1,816 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 1980 16–23 41.0% — 1,717 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 1981 7–16 30.4% — 1,638 0 6
33 — — — — — — — 1982 6–12 33.3% — 1,593 0 6
34 — — — — — — — 1983 0–1 0.0% — 1,591 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jackie Fayter Laura Dupont
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1968 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1970 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1968 — — — — 2 5 7 28.6% 4 6 10 40.0% — — — —
20 1971 2 2 4 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 1969 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1972 7 3 10 70.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1970 — — — — 7 4 11 63.6% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
22 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 11 10 21 52.4% 4 10 14 28.6% 2 7 9 22.2% 1971 — — — — 7 5 12 58.3% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — —
23 1974 — — — — 16 9 25 64.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1972 1 2 3 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 3 7 10 30.0% — — — —
24 1975 — — — — 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1973 2 4 6 33.3% 7 8 15 46.7% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 6 8 25.0%
25 1976 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1974 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 1977 — — — — 8 5 13 61.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1975 4 6 10 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0%
27 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1976 6 2 8 75.0% 14 10 24 58.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
28 1979 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1977 2 4 6 33.3% 21 7 28 75.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 10 8 18 55.6% 5 6 11 45.5% 8 4 12 66.7% 1 7 8 12.5%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 14 7 21 66.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 7 8 15 46.7% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 7 11 18 38.9%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 4 4 8 50.0% 0 6 6 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 4 3 7 57.1% 2 6 8 25.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 10 10 20 50.0% 58 51 109 53.2% 34 47 81 42.0% 11 27 38 28.9% — 57 52 109 52.3% 88 84 172 51.2% 39 54 93 41.9% 26 52 78 33.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jackie Fayter Laura Dupont
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1968 1506 108.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.50 — — — +0.04 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1969 1511 107.8 — — — — +48 — — 25.0% -1.63 — — — -0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1970 1459 95.8 — — — — +45 +20 +31 25.0% -2.44 — — — +0.30 1968 1496 96.8 — — — — — -40 +22 34.3% -1.34 1–0 — — -0.66
20 1971 1563 113.9 — — — — +9 -85 -56 47.0% -0.16 2–9 (18%) — — +2.35 1969 1494 102.2 — — — — — -26 — 42.9% -0.86 0–2 — — +0.11
21 1972 1631 125.1 — — — — +27 -85 -85 52.3% +0.36 5–3 (63%) 1–0 — +2.48 1970 1580 121.7 — — — — — +26 -62 52.5% +0.37 5–1 (83%) — — +0.70
22 1973 1550 123.1 — — — — +25 +60 -43 44.7% -0.44 1–12 (8%) 4–2 (67%) 92.4 +2.82 1971 1685 124.2 — — — — — -44 -54 57.8% +0.69 3–4 (43%) 4–2 (67%) 99.4 +1.40
23 1974 1665 130.5 — — — — — +43 -42 57.1% +0.62 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.4 +2.59 1972 1648 121.6 — — — — -106 -34 -46 40.8% -0.80 1–6 (14%) 2–1 (67%) 95.2 -1.41
24 1975 1687 118.6 — — — — — +61 -63 61.8% +0.38 3–1 (75%) 3–0 (100%) 105.0 +1.68 1973 1643 133.5 — — — — -87 +25 -74 38.8% -0.88 6–7 (46%) 3–3 (50%) 100.5 -2.68
25 1976 1632 115.2 — — — — -82 +79 -9 39.0% -0.54 3–4 (43%) 0–2 — +0.14 1974 1719 132.6 — — — — -45 -78 -83 47.6% -0.24 3–2 (60%) 4–2 (67%) 104.3 -1.83
26 1977 1652 115.1 — — — — — +80 -74 50.0% -0.25 6–2 (75%) 1–1 — +2.22 1975 1768 135.9 — — — — -32 -30 -179 50.0% -0.14 10–8 (56%) 7–2 (78%) 107.5 -2.55
27 1978 1608 120.6 — — — — -78 — +8 47.1% -0.14 3–4 (43%) 3–1 (75%) 101.2 +0.49 1976 1821 131.2 — — — — -34 -72 -180 55.9% +0.27 7–7 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 99.7 0.00
28 1979 1591 103.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.83 — — — +0.22 1977 1839 143.1 — — — — -96 +86 -292 53.3% +0.30 12–8 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 103.4 -2.78
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1730 130.7 — — — — -24 +52 -49 50.4% -0.03 8–13 (38%) 2–4 (33%) 94.1 +1.75
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1816 142.5 — — — — -23 -30 -119 47.9% +0.09 9–5 (64%) 9–6 (60%) 106.3 -0.40
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1718 128.9 — — — — -37 +25 — 40.0% -1.02 11–6 (65%) 5–5 (50%) 102.2 -2.83
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1638 117.4 — — — — +57 +8 +67 35.7% -0.98 4–6 (40%) 1–2 (33%) 96.5 -0.31
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1593 108.3 — — — — +94 -39 +49 37.8% -0.78 4–5 (44%) 1–2 (33%) 97.0 -0.10
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1592 108.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.31
Career — 1722 124.4 — — — — +9 +31 -44 47.7% -0.16 25–37 (40%) 14–7 (67%) 100.3 +5.62 — 1895 136.1 — — — — -33 -4 -72 46.9% -0.27 84–80 (51%) 48–38 (56%) 104.0 -2.61

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.