H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jackie Fayter vs Linda Geeves H2H: 2-0
Jackie Fayter holds a 2–0 lead over Linda Geeves in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jackie Fayter leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jackie Fayter won the 1978 Edinburgh Scottish Chps third round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 1978* | Edinburgh Scottish Chps | WTA 250 | R32 | — | Jackie Fayter | 6-1 6-0 | Linda Geeves | Match data |
| Jul 20, 1974* | Hoylake | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Jackie Fayter | 6-1 6-4 | Linda Geeves | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jackie Fayter | — | — | — | 1,723 | 121 | 143 | 45.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Linda Geeves | — | — | — | 1,613 | 44 | 61 | 41.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jackie Fayter | Linda Geeves | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1968 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1969 | 1–3 | 25.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1970 | 4–13 | 23.5% | — | 1,459 | 0 | 0 | 1973 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,423 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1971 | 15–21 | 41.7% | — | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 1974 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,434 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1972 | 22–20 | 52.4% | — | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 1975 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,417 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1973 | 17–29 | 37.0% | — | 1,548 | 0 | 0 | 1976 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1974 | 24–17 | 58.5% | — | 1,665 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 2–3 | 40.0% | — | 1,431 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1975 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 2 | 1978 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1976 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,632 | 0 | 2 | 1979 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1977 | 10–8 | 55.6% | — | 1,652 | 0 | 4 | 1980 | 11–9 | 55.0% | — | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1978 | 10–12 | 45.5% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 4 | 1981 | 10–8 | 55.6% | — | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1979 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,592 | 0 | 4 | 1982 | 3–3 | 50.0% | — | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |