H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Jackie Fayter vs Mima Jausovec H2H: 0-2

Mima Jausovec holds a 2–0 lead over Jackie Fayter in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Mima Jausovec leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Mima Jausovec won the 1978 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix round of 32 6-7 6-1 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jackie Fayter
GBR Age 75
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Mima Jausovec
SLO Age 70 Right-Handed 160 cm / 5'3"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mima Jausovec 6-7 6-1 6-3 Jackie Fayter Match data Oct 26, 1978* R32 Porsche Tennis Grand Prix WTA 250 Carpet
Mima Jausovec 6-0 6-3 Jackie Fayter Match data May 19, 1977* R32 Italian Open WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jackie Fayter — — — 1,721 121 143 45.8% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Mima Jausovec #400 #23 2 2,090 339 246 57.9% 1 0 0 1 5 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jackie Fayter Mima Jausovec
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1972 2–0 100.0% — 1,533 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 1973 2–1 66.7% — 1,560 0 1
17 1968 1–1 50.0% — 1,505 0 0 1974 18–13 58.1% — 1,793 0 1
18 1969 1–3 25.0% — 1,511 0 0 1975 16–19 45.7% — 1,833 0 1
19 1970 4–13 23.5% — 1,458 0 0 1976 33–16 67.3% — 2,004 0 4
20 1971 15–21 41.7% — 1,562 0 0 1977 32–21 60.4% — 2,010 1 5
21 1972 22–20 52.4% — 1,631 0 0 1978 29–19 60.4% — 1,947 1 6
22 1973 17–29 37.0% — 1,549 0 0 1979 32–28 53.3% — 1,870 1 6
23 1974 24–17 58.5% — 1,664 0 2 1980 34–22 60.7% — 1,945 1 6
24 1975 10–6 62.5% — 1,687 0 2 1981 57–28 67.1% — 2,013 1 6
25 1976 6–11 35.3% — 1,632 0 2 1982 36–24 60.0% — 1,857 1 7
26 1977 10–8 55.6% — 1,652 0 4 1983 23–16 59.0% — 1,873 1 7
27 1978 10–12 45.5% — 1,607 0 4 1984 12–17 41.4% #87 1,747 1 7
28 1979 1–2 33.3% — 1,591 0 4 1985 9–12 42.9% #82 1,695 1 7
29 — — — — — — — 1986 2–4 33.3% #184 1,673 1 7
30 — — — — — — — 1987 1–3 25.0% #233 1,656 1 7
31 — — — — — — — 1988 1–3 25.0% #362 1,641 1 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jackie Fayter Mima Jausovec
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 — — — — 2 0 2 100.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
17 1968 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1974 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 6 3 9 66.7% 5 4 9 55.6%
18 1969 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1975 2 3 5 40.0% 9 5 14 64.3% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 9 11 18.2%
19 1970 0 1 1 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1976 0 2 2 0.0% 21 3 24 87.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 9 9 18 50.0%
20 1971 2 2 4 50.0% 4 7 11 36.4% 5 6 11 45.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 1977 1 2 3 33.3% 20 6 26 76.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 10 11 21 47.6%
21 1972 7 3 10 70.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1978 2 3 5 40.0% 13 4 17 76.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 9 16 43.8%
22 1973 0 1 1 0.0% 11 10 21 52.4% 4 10 14 28.6% 2 7 9 22.2% 1979 6 7 13 46.2% 9 6 15 60.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 16 13 29 55.2%
23 1974 — — — — 16 9 25 64.0% 8 7 15 53.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1980 8 3 11 72.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 6 3 9 66.7% 16 13 29 55.2%
24 1975 — — — — 8 4 12 66.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1981 4 3 7 57.1% 15 6 21 71.4% 10 5 15 66.7% 28 14 42 66.7%
25 1976 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1982 2 4 6 33.3% 9 5 14 64.3% 2 5 7 28.6% 23 10 33 69.7%
26 1977 — — — — 8 5 13 61.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 6 4 10 60.0% 13 6 19 68.4% 3 2 5 60.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
27 1978 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 10 7 17 58.8% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
28 1979 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1985 2 5 7 28.6% 7 5 12 58.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — —
Career — 10 10 20 50.0% 58 51 109 53.2% 34 47 81 42.0% 11 27 38 28.9% — 35 43 78 44.9% 145 67 212 68.4% 42 33 75 56.0% 117 103 220 53.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jackie Fayter Mima Jausovec
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1972 1533 109.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +3.75 — — — +0.55
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1973 1561 114.8 — — — — — +38 — 57.1% +1.57 1–0 — — +0.21
17 1968 1506 108.3 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.50 — — — +0.04 1974 1794 144.8 — — — — -138 -70 -107 55.2% +0.37 4–3 (57%) 4–5 (44%) 102.8 -1.90
18 1969 1511 107.8 — — — — +48 — — 25.0% -1.63 — — — -0.54 1975 1833 146.7 — — — — -145 +20 -114 48.1% -0.05 7–6 (54%) 2–2 (50%) 101.7 -1.97
19 1970 1459 95.8 — — — — +45 +20 +31 25.0% -2.44 — — — +0.30 1976 2004 156.6 — — — — -268 +60 -233 61.6% +1.23 11–5 (69%) 4–6 (40%) 104.5 -3.78
20 1971 1563 113.9 — — — — +9 -85 -56 47.0% -0.16 2–9 (18%) — — +2.35 1977 2011 161.6 — — — — -207 +128 -274 61.5% +0.98 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 95.6 -5.51
21 1972 1631 125.1 — — — — +27 -85 -85 52.3% +0.36 5–3 (63%) 1–0 — +2.48 1978 1947 147.6 — — — — -137 +161 -129 58.9% +0.51 10–5 (67%) 3–5 (38%) 100.0 -3.80
22 1973 1550 123.1 — — — — +25 +60 -43 44.7% -0.44 1–12 (8%) 4–2 (67%) 92.4 +2.82 1979 1871 146.4 — — — — -10 +166 -109 54.4% +0.40 6–10 (38%) 5–5 (50%) 95.8 -0.84
23 1974 1665 130.5 — — — — — +43 -42 57.1% +0.62 2–2 (50%) 2–1 (67%) 101.4 +2.59 1980 1945 155.9 — — — — +3 +49 -109 58.7% +0.84 6–3 (67%) 3–9 (25%) 100.1 -3.63
24 1975 1687 118.6 — — — — — +61 -63 61.8% +0.38 3–1 (75%) 3–0 (100%) 105.0 +1.68 1981 2013 157.1 — — — — 0 +4 -103 63.1% +1.07 16–11 (59%) 11–4 (73%) 104.3 -2.76
25 1976 1632 115.2 — — — — -82 +79 -9 39.0% -0.54 3–4 (43%) 0–2 — +0.14 1982 1858 148.5 — — — — +114 +111 -66 59.3% +0.50 9–13 (41%) 9–3 (75%) 95.9 -0.56
26 1977 1652 115.1 — — — — — +80 -74 50.0% -0.25 6–2 (75%) 1–1 — +2.22 1983 1874 143.9 — — — — -17 +151 -63 58.4% +0.64 5–6 (45%) 2–5 (29%) 94.5 -2.67
27 1978 1608 120.6 — — — — -78 — +8 47.1% -0.14 3–4 (43%) 3–1 (75%) 101.2 +0.49 1984 1748 131.7 — — — — -27 +199 — 46.8% -0.18 1–5 (17%) 2–5 (29%) 88.9 -1.31
28 1979 1591 103.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.83 — — — +0.22 1985 1695 127.6 — — — — -21 +205 — 45.8% -0.33 2–4 (33%) 2–2 (50%) 94.8 -0.67
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1673 105.7 — — — — — +197 — 40.0% -1.80 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.18
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1656 107.2 — — — — — +179 — 40.0% -1.60 0–2 — — -0.33
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1641 110.1 — — — — — +162 — 25.0% -2.75 — — — -0.77
Career — 1722 124.4 — — — — +9 +31 -44 47.7% -0.16 25–37 (40%) 14–7 (67%) 100.3 +5.62 — 2091 156.0 — — — — -46 +105 -119 57.2% +0.57 84–85 (50%) 55–55 (50%) 94.6 -5.15

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.