H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Jamie Golder vs Pamela Jung H2H: 2-0

Jamie Golder holds a 2–0 lead over Pamela Jung in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jamie Golder leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jamie Golder won the 1987 ASB Classic round of 32 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jamie Golder
USA Age 64 Right-Handed
H2H
2 – 0
2 main-draw meetings
Pamela Jung
USA Age 63

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jamie Golder #191 6-3 6-2 Pamela Jung Match data Jan 28, 1987* R32 ASB Classic WTA 250 Hard
Jamie Golder 6-3 6-1 Pamela Jung Match data Aug 5, 1982* R32 Bethesda WTA 250 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jamie Golder #366 #165 3 1,633 24 42 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Pamela Jung — — — 1,525 6 14 30.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jamie Golder Pamela Jung
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,509 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1982 2–5 28.6% — 1,466 0 0
20 1982 6–6 50.0% — 1,522 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 1983 2–3 40.0% — 1,537 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 1984 8–11 42.1% — 1,582 0 0 1986 0–3 0.0% — 1,426 0 0
23 1985 1–6 14.3% — 1,523 0 0 1987 1–1 50.0% — 1,433 0 0
24 1986 3–4 42.9% #188 1,517 0 0 1988 2–4 33.3% — 1,418 0 0
25 1987 3–8 27.3% #208 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1988 1–4 20.0% #347 1,442 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jamie Golder Pamela Jung
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1982 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1983 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1984 2 3 5 40.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
23 1985 1 1 2 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1987 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1986 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1987 2 2 4 50.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1988 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 7 12 19 36.8% 9 18 27 33.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 3 3 0.0% — 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jamie Golder Pamela Jung
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1509 110.6 — — — — — — — 50.0% +1.00 — — — -0.21
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1466 92.2 — — — — — — — 25.0% -1.56 2–0 1–3 (25%) — +0.24
20 1982 1523 112.3 — — — — +38 — — 45.5% +0.14 — — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1983 1538 103.3 — — — — — — +79 25.0% -2.13 — — — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1984 1583 117.1 — — — — -45 +50 +45 40.0% -1.03 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — -0.07 1986 1426 91.8 — — — — — — — 14.3% -2.14 0–1 — — +0.42
23 1985 1523 97.2 — — — — +6 +23 — 20.0% -2.27 0–1 1–0 — +0.44 1987 1433 96.5 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 — — +0.28
24 1986 1517 106.0 — — — — — +47 — 42.9% -0.29 — 1–0 — +0.94 1988 1418 94.5 — — — — +64 — — 33.3% -0.93 2–1 (67%) 1–0 — +0.83
25 1987 1469 105.5 — — — — +46 +17 — 36.0% -1.28 0–3 (0%) — — +0.86 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1988 1443 100.1 — — — — +22 — — 25.0% -2.17 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1633 111.5 — — — — +7 +38 +64 36.0% -1.11 3–7 (30%) 4–2 (67%) 97.8 +3.68 — 1526 93.9 — — — — +64 — — 29.8% -1.17 5–2 (71%) 2–3 (40%) 103.3 +7.80

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.