H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jana Kandarr vs Helena Sukova H2H: 1-1
Jana Kandarr and Helena Sukova are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Helena Sukova leads 1–0 on carpet, while Jana Kandarr leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Helena Sukova won the 1996 Linz third round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 49
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 61
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 29, 1996* | Linz | WTA 500 | R32 | Carpet | Helena Sukova | 6-2 6-2 | Jana Kandarr | Match data |
| May 17, 1995* | German Open | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Jana Kandarr | 6-0 6-3 | Helena Sukova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Kandarr | #459 | #43 | 687 | 1,641 | 66 | 119 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Helena Sukova | #102 | #4 | 735 | 2,217 | 580 | 297 | 66.1% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 5 | 9 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jana Kandarr | Helena Sukova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #313 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,757 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #81 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 33–20 | 62.3% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #90 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 48–23 | 67.6% | #7 | 2,041 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 1997 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #85 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 54–21 | 72.0% | #9 | 2,028 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1998 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 69–21 | 76.7% | #6 | 2,151 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1999 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #157 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 58–19 | 75.3% | #7 | 2,129 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 49–19 | 72.1% | #8 | 2,120 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2001 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #70 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 39–15 | 72.2% | #8 | 2,043 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2002 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #131 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 41–17 | 70.7% | #14 | 2,025 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #451 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #17 | 1,958 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,976 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 24–15 | 61.5% | #17 | 1,925 | 0 | 9 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 21–14 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,889 | 0 | 9 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #29 | 1,819 | 0 | 9 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #35 | 1,792 | 0 | 9 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 8–21 | 27.6% | #80 | 1,661 | 0 | 9 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #102 | 1,637 | 0 | 9 |