H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Jana Kandarr vs Natasha Zvereva H2H: 0-2
Natasha Zvereva holds a 2–0 lead over Jana Kandarr in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Natasha Zvereva leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Natasha Zvereva won the 1998 Filderstadt third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 49
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
BLR
Age 55
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 8, 1998* | Filderstadt | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Natasha Zvereva | 6-3 6-2 | Jana Kandarr | Match data |
| Aug 30, 1995* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Natasha Zvereva | 6-4 6-0 | Jana Kandarr | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Kandarr | #459 | #43 | 687 | 1,641 | 66 | 119 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Natasha Zvereva | #201 | #5 | 1,820 | 2,073 | 388 | 232 | 62.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jana Kandarr | Natasha Zvereva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #94 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 21–11 | 65.6% | #19 | 1,831 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #313 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 38–17 | 69.1% | #7 | 1,991 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #81 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #27 | 1,802 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #90 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 38–15 | 71.7% | #12 | 1,955 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1997 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #85 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #21 | 1,912 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1998 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #23 | 1,977 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1999 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #157 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 37–19 | 66.1% | #19 | 1,972 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 29–12 | 70.7% | #10 | 1,978 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2001 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #70 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 31–17 | 64.6% | #14 | 1,971 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2002 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #131 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #57 | 1,877 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #451 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #25 | 1,902 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #16 | 1,932 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 24–19 | 55.8% | #27 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #78 | 1,759 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,733 | 0 | 5 |