H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Jana Kandarr vs Sabine Appelmans H2H: 0-2
Sabine Appelmans holds a 2–0 lead over Jana Kandarr in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sabine Appelmans leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sabine Appelmans won the 1999 US Open first round 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
GER
Age 49
Right-Handed
181 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 54
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 1999* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Sabine Appelmans | 6-2 7-6 | Jana Kandarr | Match data |
| Jan 9, 1997* | Sydney | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Sabine Appelmans | 6-0 6-1 | Jana Kandarr | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Kandarr | #459 | #43 | 687 | 1,641 | 66 | 119 | 35.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Sabine Appelmans | #94 | #16 | 1,502 | 1,923 | 279 | 202 | 58.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jana Kandarr | Sabine Appelmans | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #283 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #196 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #313 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #144 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #81 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #22 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #90 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 34–14 | 70.8% | #18 | 1,873 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1997 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #85 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #26 | 1,875 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1998 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #90 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #36 | 1,828 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1999 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #157 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 29–16 | 64.4% | #27 | 1,821 | 0 | 5 |
| 23 | 2000 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #61 | 1,567 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #31 | 1,809 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2001 | 12–21 | 36.4% | #70 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 26–16 | 61.9% | #21 | 1,843 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2002 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #131 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 37–26 | 58.7% | #16 | 1,856 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #451 | 1,535 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #48 | 1,721 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #30 | 1,777 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #49 | 1,692 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #94 | 1,685 | 0 | 7 |