H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jana Novotna vs Elena Brioukhovets H2H: 2-0
Jana Novotna holds a 2–0 lead over Elena Brioukhovets in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Jana Novotna leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Jana Novotna won the 1992 Hamburg third round 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
UKR
Age 55
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 1992* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Jana Novotna | 6-3 6-2 | Elena Brioukhovets | Match data |
| Jun 2, 1991* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Jana Novotna | 7-6(6) 6-2 | Elena Brioukhovets | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Novotna | #18 | #2 | 5,063 | 2,224 | 504 | 198 | 71.8% | 1 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 13 | 24 |
| Elena Brioukhovets | #627 | #46 | 124 | 1,687 | 44 | 64 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jana Novotna | Elena Brioukhovets | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #35 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 9–6 | 60.0% | #73 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #11 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #97 | 1,644 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 40–16 | 71.4% | #13 | 2,016 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #132 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,072 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #121 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #10 | 2,089 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #129 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 46–15 | 75.4% | #6 | 2,103 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #293 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 43–11 | 79.6% | #4 | 2,141 | 0 | 10 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1995 | 30–12 | 71.4% | #11 | 2,031 | 0 | 11 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #306 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1996 | 47–12 | 79.7% | #5 | 2,209 | 0 | 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1997 | 52–15 | 77.6% | #2 | 2,173 | 0 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1998 | 50–14 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,129 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1999 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #18 | 1,924 | 1 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |