H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Jana Novotna vs Laura Arraya H2H: 4-1
Jana Novotna holds a 4–1 lead over Laura Arraya in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Jana Novotna leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Jana Novotna won the 1991 Washington fourth round 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
4
–
1
5 main draw meetings
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 19, 1991 | Washington | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Jana Novotna | 6-1 6-1 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1990* | US Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Hard | Jana Novotna | 6-3 6-1 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
| Aug 12, 1990* | Albuquerque | WTA 250 | F | Hard | Jana Novotna | 6-4 6-4 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
| Mar 10, 1990* | Boca Raton | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Laura Arraya | 3-6 6-3 6-3 | Jana Novotna | Match data |
| Oct 19, 1989* | Zurich | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Jana Novotna | 6-1 6-2 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Novotna | #18 | #2 | 5,063 | 2,224 | 504 | 198 | 71.8% | 1 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 13 | 24 |
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jana Novotna | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1987 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 1988 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #35 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 |
| 20 | 1989 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #11 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1990 | 40–16 | 71.4% | #13 | 2,016 | 0 | 3 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1991 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,072 | 0 | 5 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1992 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #10 | 2,089 | 0 | 5 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1993 | 46–15 | 75.4% | #6 | 2,103 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1994 | 43–11 | 79.6% | #4 | 2,141 | 0 | 10 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 1995 | 30–12 | 71.4% | #11 | 2,031 | 0 | 11 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 1996 | 47–12 | 79.7% | #5 | 2,209 | 0 | 15 | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 1997 | 52–15 | 77.6% | #2 | 2,173 | 0 | 19 | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | 1998 | 50–14 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,129 | 1 | 23 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | 1999 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #18 | 1,924 | 1 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |