H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Jana Novotna vs Patty Fendick H2H: 5-3

Jana Novotna holds a 5–3 lead over Patty Fendick in their WTA head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Jana Novotna leads 2–1 on grass. Most recently, Jana Novotna won the 1994 Manhattan Beach fourth round 6-3 6-3.

CZE Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
5 3
8 main draw meetings
USA Age 61 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 12, 1994* Manhattan Beach WTA 250 R16 Hard Jana Novotna #8 6-3 6-3 Patty Fendick #41 Match data
Oct 24, 1993* Brighton WTA 250 SF Carpet Jana Novotna #8 4-6 6-0 6-3 Patty Fendick #29 Match data
Jun 28, 1992* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Patty Fendick #68 6-3 6-3 Jana Novotna #11 Match data
Jan 9, 1992* Sydney WTA 500 R32 Hard Jana Novotna #7 7-6 2-1 (ret.) Patty Fendick #48 Match data
Jul 4, 1990* Wimbledon Grand Slam R16 Grass Jana Novotna #14 6-2 6-4 Patty Fendick #48 Match data
Jan 21, 1990* Australian Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Patty Fendick #34 1-6 7-6(5) 6-4 Jana Novotna #11 Match data
Jan 7, 1989* Brisbane WTA 500 QF Hard Patty Fendick #21 6-4 6-1 Jana Novotna #45 Match data
Jan 2, 1988* Brisbane WTA 500 SF Grass Jana Novotna #47 7-5 6-1 Patty Fendick #79 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Jana Novotna #18 #2 5,063 2,224 504 198 71.8% 1 4 1 5 13 24
Patty Fendick #360 #19 55 1,883 199 162 55.1% 0 0 0 0 3 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jana Novotna Patty Fendick
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1986 0–4 0.0% #171 1,466 0 0 1982 0–1 0.0% 1,499 0 0
18 1987 21–17 55.3% #47 1,752 0 0 1983 1–8 11.1% 1,430 0 0
19 1988 23–18 56.1% #35 1,757 0 1 1984 2–1 66.7% #120 1,470 0 0
20 1989 45–17 72.6% #11 1,962 0 2 1985 6–8 42.9% #83 1,551 0 0
21 1990 40–16 71.4% #13 2,016 0 3 1986 8–6 57.1% #95 1,643 0 0
22 1991 45–15 75.0% #7 2,072 0 5 1987 8–9 47.1% #79 1,674 0 0
23 1992 36–17 67.9% #10 2,089 0 5 1988 38–16 70.4% #22 1,798 0 2
24 1993 46–15 75.4% #6 2,103 0 7 1989 22–13 62.9% #31 1,762 0 3
25 1994 43–11 79.6% #4 2,141 0 10 1990 16–15 51.6% #42 1,740 0 3
26 1995 30–12 71.4% #11 2,031 0 11 1991 16–18 47.1% #56 1,690 0 3
27 1996 47–12 79.7% #5 2,209 0 15 1992 17–17 50.0% #43 1,779 0 3
28 1997 52–15 77.6% #2 2,173 0 19 1993 29–17 63.0% #27 1,839 0 3
29 1998 50–14 78.1% #3 2,129 1 23 1994 23–20 53.5% #50 1,725 0 3
30 1999 26–15 63.4% #18 1,924 1 24 1995 13–13 50.0% #57 1,691 0 3