H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jana Novotna vs Radka Bobkova H2H: 1-0
Jana Novotna holds a 1–0 lead over Radka Bobkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jana Novotna leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jana Novotna won the 1998 Prague fourth round 6-2 7-6.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 53
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 1998* | Prague | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Jana Novotna | 6-2 7-6 | Radka Bobkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Novotna | #18 | #2 | 5,063 | 2,224 | 504 | 198 | 71.8% | 1 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 13 | 24 |
| Radka Bobkova | #639 | #47 | 322 | 1,658 | 47 | 73 | 39.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jana Novotna | Radka Bobkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1987 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #145 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #35 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #146 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #11 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #53 | 1,600 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1990 | 40–16 | 71.4% | #13 | 2,016 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 13–15 | 46.4% | #85 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1991 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,072 | 0 | 5 | 1995 | 8–15 | 34.8% | #130 | 1,558 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1992 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #10 | 2,089 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #144 | 1,525 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1993 | 46–15 | 75.4% | #6 | 2,103 | 0 | 7 | 1997 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #173 | 1,526 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1994 | 43–11 | 79.6% | #4 | 2,141 | 0 | 10 | 1998 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #88 | 1,538 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1995 | 30–12 | 71.4% | #11 | 2,031 | 0 | 11 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #399 | 1,531 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1996 | 47–12 | 79.7% | #5 | 2,209 | 0 | 15 | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #639 | 1,475 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 1997 | 52–15 | 77.6% | #2 | 2,173 | 0 | 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1998 | 50–14 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,129 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1999 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #18 | 1,924 | 1 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |