H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Jana Novotna vs Silke Meier H2H: 1-1
Jana Novotna and Silke Meier are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Silke Meier leads 1–0 on carpet, while Jana Novotna leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Jana Novotna won the 1989 Hamburg third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 58
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 1989* | Hamburg | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Jana Novotna | 6-1 6-2 | Silke Meier | Match data |
| Oct 9, 1986* | Zurich | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Silke Meier | 3-6 6-1 6-1 | Jana Novotna | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jana Novotna | #18 | #2 | 5,063 | 2,224 | 504 | 198 | 71.8% | 1 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 13 | 24 |
| Silke Meier | #948 | #40 | 101 | 1,667 | 81 | 141 | 36.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Jana Novotna | Silke Meier | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #164 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1986 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,466 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1987 | 21–17 | 55.3% | #47 | 1,752 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #50 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1988 | 23–18 | 56.1% | #35 | 1,757 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,590 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 45–17 | 72.6% | #11 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 40–16 | 71.4% | #13 | 2,016 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #132 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 45–15 | 75.0% | #7 | 2,072 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #138 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #10 | 2,089 | 0 | 5 | 1992 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #80 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 46–15 | 75.4% | #6 | 2,103 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #151 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 43–11 | 79.6% | #4 | 2,141 | 0 | 10 | 1994 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #113 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 30–12 | 71.4% | #11 | 2,031 | 0 | 11 | 1995 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #91 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1996 | 47–12 | 79.7% | #5 | 2,209 | 0 | 15 | 1996 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #205 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1997 | 52–15 | 77.6% | #2 | 2,173 | 0 | 19 | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #234 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1998 | 50–14 | 78.1% | #3 | 2,129 | 1 | 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 1999 | 26–15 | 63.4% | #18 | 1,924 | 1 | 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |