H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Jane Chi vs Ginger Helgeson H2H: 0-1

Ginger Helgeson holds a 1–0 lead over Jane Chi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ginger Helgeson leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Ginger Helgeson won the 1997 Birmingham round of 64 6-4 6-0.

USA Age 52 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
USA Age 57 Right-Handed

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Ginger Helgeson #555 6-4 6-0 Jane Chi #134 Match data Jun 11, 1997* R64 Birmingham Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jane Chi #967 #62 440 1,585 14 21 40.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Ginger Helgeson #467 #29 246 1,865 94 95 49.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jane Chi Ginger Helgeson
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
19 1993 0–1 0.0% 1,493 0 0
20 1989 0–2 0.0% #239 1,485 0 0
21 1990 1–2 33.3% #246 1,498 0 0
22 1996 1–1 50.0% #155 1,496 0 0 1991 17–17 50.0% #58 1,647 0 0
23 1997 1–3 25.0% #244 1,485 0 0 1992 12–15 44.4% #71 1,648 0 0
24 1998 3–1 75.0% #84 1,539 0 0 1993 22–20 52.4% #54 1,736 0 0
25 1999 9–13 40.9% #106 1,521 0 0 1994 29–17 63.0% #30 1,777 0 1
26 2000 0–2 0.0% #285 1,493 0 0 1995 8–7 53.3% #111 1,772 0 1
27 1996 0–2 0.0% #792 1,721 0 1
28 1997 3–8 27.3% #167 1,639 0 1
29 1998 2–5 28.6% #152 1,572 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jane Chi Ginger Helgeson
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
19 1993 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1990 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 1991 9 7 16 56.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
23 1997 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 8 9 17 47.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1998 3 1 4 75.0% 1993 11 9 20 55.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
25 1999 8 8 16 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1994 20 9 29 69.0% 7 5 12 58.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2000 0 2 2 0.0% 1995 5 5 10 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
27 1996 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 1997 0 6 6 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
29 1998 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 10 14 24 41.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 55 50 105 52.4% 28 24 52 53.8% 9 13 22 40.9% 2 8 10 20.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jane Chi Ginger Helgeson
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 1993 1493 100.8 0.0% -4.00 -0.14
20 1989 1486 104.0 0.0% -2.75 0–1 +0.02
21 1990 1498 100.1 28.6% -2.00 1–0 -0.32
22 1996 1497 97.2 40.0% -1.60 1–0 +0.42 1991 1647 138.4 -14 +44 48.1% -0.22 6–3 (67%) 5–5 (50%) 106.2 -1.02
23 1997 1485 106.6 +46 25.0% -0.75 0–1 -0.07 1992 1649 128.8 +13 +33 -159 48.5% -0.17 4–8 (33%) 6–3 (67%) 98.8 +0.26
24 1998 1539 118.1 +39 77.8% +2.11 0–1 +0.41 1993 1737 139.0 -44 -4 -162 52.6% +0.62 7–6 (54%) 1–2 (33%) -0.91
25 1999 1521 108.0 +69 -6 37.5% -0.90 4–2 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 101.5 +2.07 1994 1777 146.6 +6 -21 -203 61.0% +0.87 5–3 (63%) 4–1 (80%) 104.6 +1.21
26 2000 1494 93.7 0.0% -4.25 +0.14 1995 1773 137.3 -13 +12 60.0% +0.67 0–4 (0%) 0–2 -0.56
27 1996 1721 92.9 0.0% -3.50 0–1 +0.20
28 1997 1639 107.6 -14 -6 30.4% -1.22 0–1 -0.15
29 1998 1573 99.1 +16 41.2% -0.71 0–3 (0%) 2–2 (50%) 94.9 +1.00
Career 1585 109.2 +61 -6 38.2% -0.83 5–3 (63%) 2–5 (29%) 100.6 +8.09 1865 140.4 -9 +11 -127 50.6% +0.14 23–28 (45%) 18–17 (51%) 99.4 -0.14

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.