H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Jane Chi vs Naoko Sawamatsu H2H: 0-1

Naoko Sawamatsu holds a 1–0 lead over Jane Chi in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Naoko Sawamatsu leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Naoko Sawamatsu won the 1997 Japan Women's Open round of 32 6-3 6-4.

USA Age 52 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"
H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings
JPN Age 53 Right-Handed 167 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Naoko Sawamatsu #43 6-3 6-4 Jane Chi #149 Match data Apr 17, 1997* R32 Japan Women's Open Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jane Chi #967 #62 440 1,585 14 21 40.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Naoko Sawamatsu #266 #14 881 1,970 183 129 58.7% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jane Chi Naoko Sawamatsu
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1989 0–2 0.0% #262 1,477 0 0
17 1990 14–6 70.0% #31 1,669 0 1
18 1991 21–16 56.8% #33 1,723 0 1
19 1993 0–1 0.0% 1,493 0 0 1992 23–13 63.9% #24 1,856 0 1
20 1993 24–13 64.9% #28 1,853 0 2
21 1994 24–12 66.7% #26 1,870 0 3
22 1996 1–1 50.0% #155 1,496 0 0 1995 22–13 62.9% #17 1,847 0 3
23 1997 1–3 25.0% #244 1,485 0 0 1996 19–17 52.8% #38 1,811 0 3
24 1998 3–1 75.0% #84 1,539 0 0 1997 24–19 55.8% #34 1,849 0 4
25 1999 9–13 40.9% #106 1,521 0 0 1998 12–18 40.0% #55 1,721 0 4
26 2000 0–2 0.0% #285 1,493 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jane Chi Naoko Sawamatsu
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1990 13 3 16 81.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
18 1991 13 10 23 56.5% 7 3 10 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1993 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 13 7 20 65.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 3 1 4 75.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
20 1993 12 8 20 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 4 2 6 66.7% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 1994 15 7 22 68.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 4 2 6 66.7%
22 1996 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 14 8 22 63.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7%
23 1997 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 1996 11 11 22 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
24 1998 3 1 4 75.0% 1997 20 12 32 62.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 1999 8 8 16 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1998 6 10 16 37.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2000 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 10 14 24 41.7% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 117 77 194 60.3% 36 27 63 57.1% 20 16 36 55.6% 10 9 19 52.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jane Chi Naoko Sawamatsu
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1989 1477 96.0 20.0% -2.20 0–1 +0.30
17 1990 1669 124.7 +57 62.5% +0.77 6–2 (75%) 5–1 (83%) 110.2 +1.75
18 1991 1724 133.2 -8 -44 -170 55.4% +0.49 5–6 (45%) 1–1 +2.14
19 1993 1493 100.8 0.0% -4.00 -0.14 1992 1857 143.8 -17 -155 -248 60.7% +0.42 7–5 (58%) 4–2 (67%) 104.0 -0.25
20 1993 1853 139.0 -68 -33 -152 62.1% +0.86 7–6 (54%) 2–0 +0.17
21 1994 1871 146.2 -20 -58 -130 60.7% +1.00 9–3 (75%) 4–3 (57%) 106.5 -0.99
22 1996 1497 97.2 40.0% -1.60 1–0 +0.42 1995 1848 150.6 +59 -74 -92 58.6% +0.48 10–7 (59%) 6–3 (67%) 103.1 +1.09
23 1997 1485 106.6 +46 25.0% -0.75 0–1 -0.07 1996 1812 145.0 +5 +4 -6 53.2% +0.02 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 97.8 -0.27
24 1998 1539 118.1 +39 77.8% +2.11 0–1 +0.41 1997 1850 153.6 +44 -92 -62 54.0% +0.35 10–6 (63%) 5–5 (50%) 103.9 -1.59
25 1999 1521 108.0 +69 -6 37.5% -0.90 4–2 (67%) 2–4 (33%) 101.5 +2.07 1998 1721 125.2 +37 -25 +64 40.5% -0.62 8–6 (57%) 1–1 -0.88
26 2000 1494 93.7 0.0% -4.25 +0.14
Career 1585 109.2 +61 -6 38.2% -0.83 5–3 (63%) 2–5 (29%) 100.6 +8.09 1971 148.7 +11 -58 -103 56.1% +0.40 67–48 (58%) 31–18 (63%) 109.3 +0.47

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.