H2H data updated: 2026-10-26 00:00 UTC

Jane Preyer vs Kate Brasher H2H: 1-0

Jane Preyer holds a 1–0 lead over Kate Brasher in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jane Preyer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jane Preyer won the 1981 Beckenham round of 32 5-7 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Jane Preyer
USA Age 72
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Kate Brasher
GBR Age 64

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jane Preyer 5-7 6-4 6-2 Kate Brasher Match data Jun 4, 1981* R32 Beckenham WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jane Preyer — — — 1,686 36 43 45.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kate Brasher — — — 1,734 73 61 54.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jane Preyer Kate Brasher
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 — — — — — — — 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0
14 — — — — — — — 1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,465 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1978 7–7 50.0% — 1,493 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1979 0–4 0.0% — 1,440 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1980 8–11 42.1% — 1,480 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1981 29–16 64.4% — 1,622 0 2
19 — — — — — — — 1982 25–11 69.4% — 1,638 0 4
20 — — — — — — — 1983 3–5 37.5% — 1,612 0 6
21 — — — — — — — 1984 1–2 33.3% — 1,584 0 6
22 1976 1–1 50.0% — 1,496 0 0 1985 0–3 0.0% — 1,531 0 6
23 1977 1–3 25.0% — 1,468 0 0 — — — — — — —
24 1978 4–2 66.7% — 1,528 0 0 — — — — — — —
25 1979 3–3 50.0% — 1,521 0 0 — — — — — — —
26 1980 8–11 42.1% — 1,530 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1981 11–9 55.0% — 1,645 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1982 8–11 42.1% — 1,634 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 1983 0–3 0.0% — 1,585 0 0 — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jane Preyer Kate Brasher
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1976 1481 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.46
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1977 1466 99.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 1–1 — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1978 1493 109.5 — — — — — — +18 50.0% +0.37 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.67
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1440 92.3 — — — — — +18 — 0.0% -3.17 — — — +0.64
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1481 106.8 — — — — — -8 +24 42.2% -0.47 4–3 (57%) — — +0.59
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1622 128.1 — — — — — — -125 63.4% +0.97 2–5 (29%) 4–3 (57%) 97.1 +0.47
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1639 118.1 — — — — -125 -5 -131 64.1% +1.04 6–2 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 105.1 +2.59
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1612 104.4 — — — — — — -133 35.0% -1.20 3–1 (75%) 0–3 (0%) 100.1 +0.31
21 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1585 95.2 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.43 1–0 — — +0.62
22 1976 1497 98.4 — — — — — — — 60.0% -0.20 0–1 1–0 — +0.09 1985 1531 92.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — +0.31
23 1977 1468 92.6 — — — — — — +56 30.0% -1.30 1–1 0–2 — +0.80 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1978 1528 110.6 — — — — — — +91 60.0% +0.47 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.68 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 1979 1522 100.3 — — — — — +38 — 42.9% -0.22 2–0 1–1 — +1.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
26 1980 1530 93.4 — — — — — — +86 39.5% -1.05 6–3 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 102.9 +0.85 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1981 1646 121.9 — — — — -134 — +158 52.2% -0.22 4–2 (67%) 1–0 — +0.71 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1982 1635 122.1 — — — — -162 — +124 44.4% -0.58 3–4 (43%) 1–0 — +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 1983 1585 95.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1686 111.8 — — — — -150 +38 +121 45.1% -0.57 18–12 (60%) 6–8 (43%) 103.5 +5.86 — 1735 116.9 — — — — -125 -4 -77 52.8% +0.29 17–13 (57%) 9–11 (45%) 102.6 +5.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.