H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Jane Preyer vs Sally Reeves H2H: 1-0

Jane Preyer holds a 1–0 lead over Sally Reeves in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jane Preyer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jane Preyer won the 1982 Beckenham round of 64 2-6 7-6 6-4.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jane Preyer 2-6 7-6 6-4 Sally Reeves Match data Jun 3, 1982* R64 Beckenham WTA 250 Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jane Preyer 1,685 36 43 45.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sally Reeves 1,516 11 26 29.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jane Preyer Sally Reeves
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1980 2–3 40.0% 1,476 0 0
16 1981 3–6 33.3% 1,450 0 0
17 1982 5–7 41.7% 1,439 0 0
18 1983 0–1 0.0% 1,426 0 0
19 1984 0–1 0.0% 1,423 0 0
20 1985 1–3 25.0% 1,427 0 0
21 1986 0–4 0.0% 1,394 0 0
22 1976 1–1 50.0% 1,496 0 0 1987 0–1 0.0% 1,389 0 0
23 1977 1–3 25.0% 1,468 0 0
24 1978 4–2 66.7% 1,528 0 0
25 1979 3–3 50.0% 1,522 0 0
26 1980 8–11 42.1% 1,529 0 0
27 1981 11–9 55.0% 1,645 0 0
28 1982 8–11 42.1% 1,634 0 0
29 1983 0–3 0.0% 1,584 0 0

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jane Preyer Sally Reeves
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1980 1477 91.7 25.0% -2.63 -0.04
16 1981 1450 102.0 38.1% -0.81 1–2 (33%) 0–1 +0.25
17 1982 1440 105.7 +81 47.8% +0.17 0–3 (0%) 1–1 +1.86
18 1983 1426 98.0 0.0% -2.50 +0.07
19 1984 1424 100.2 33.3% -1.00 0–1 1–0 -0.10
20 1985 1428 103.6 30.0% -1.30 1–1 0.00
21 1986 1394 96.5 +126 20.0% -2.60 0–2 1–0 +0.34
22 1976 1497 98.4 60.0% -0.20 0–1 1–0 +0.09 1987 1389 97.4 0.0% -4.00 +0.01
23 1977 1468 92.6 +55 30.0% -1.30 1–1 0–2 +0.80
24 1978 1529 110.5 +90 60.0% +0.47 2–1 (67%) 0–2 +0.66
25 1979 1522 100.3 +38 42.9% -0.22 2–0 1–1 +1.09
26 1980 1530 93.2 +86 39.5% -1.05 6–3 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 102.9 +0.82
27 1981 1645 121.7 -135 +159 52.2% -0.22 4–2 (67%) 1–0 +0.70
28 1982 1634 121.9 -162 +124 44.4% -0.58 3–4 (43%) 1–0 +0.14
29 1983 1584 95.2 0.0% -3.00 +0.36
Career 1686 111.6 -150 +38 +121 45.1% -0.57 18–12 (60%) 6–8 (43%) 103.5 +5.90 1516 99.8 +81 +126 34.2% -1.13 2–9 (18%) 3–2 (60%) 93.8 +7.03

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.