H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Jane Preyer vs Stacy Margolin H2H: 1-0

Jane Preyer holds a 1–0 lead over Stacy Margolin in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Jane Preyer leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Jane Preyer won the 1982 Atlanta round of 32 6-2 6-3.

H2H
1 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Jane Preyer 6-2 6-3 Stacy Margolin Match data Aug 12, 1982* R32 Atlanta WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Jane Preyer 1,685 36 43 45.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Stacy Margolin 1,854 73 99 42.4% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Jane Preyer Stacy Margolin
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1976 2–1 66.7% 1,523 0 1
18 1977 1–5 16.7% 1,504 0 2
19 1978 16–5 76.2% 1,781 0 4
20 1979 12–20 37.5% 1,753 0 4
21 1980 25–26 49.0% 1,774 0 4
22 1976 1–1 50.0% 1,496 0 0 1981 11–20 35.5% 1,696 0 4
23 1977 1–3 25.0% 1,468 0 0 1982 4–14 22.2% 1,541 0 4
24 1978 4–2 66.7% 1,528 0 0 1983 2–5 28.6% 1,518 0 4
25 1979 3–3 50.0% 1,522 0 0 1984 0–1 0.0% 1,512 0 4
26 1980 8–11 42.1% 1,529 0 0 1985 0–2 0.0% 1,479 0 4
27 1981 11–9 55.0% 1,645 0 0
28 1982 8–11 42.1% 1,634 0 0
29 1983 0–3 0.0% 1,584 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Jane Preyer Stacy Margolin
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1976 1 0 1 100.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1977 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
19 1978 9 3 12 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1979 1 7 8 12.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 9 9 18 50.0%
21 1980 14 7 21 66.7% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 9 14 23 39.1%
22 1981 6 6 12 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 9 13 30.8%
23 1977 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1982 0 5 5 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
24 1978 4 1 5 80.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1983 1 2 3 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3%
25 1979 2 1 3 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 0 1 1 0.0%
26 1980 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1985 0 1 1 0.0%
27 1981 0 4 4 0.0% 11 4 15 73.3%
28 1982 1 3 4 25.0% 7 7 14 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
29 1983 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career 1 9 10 10.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 27 20 47 57.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 32 34 66 48.5% 4 13 17 23.5% 6 13 19 31.6% 25 36 61 41.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Jane Preyer Stacy Margolin
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1976 1524 94.1 +93 50.0% -1.00 +0.93
18 1977 1505 107.1 +54 33.3% -1.00 0–2 0–3 (0%) +0.64
19 1978 1781 145.4 -10 68.8% +1.56 4–2 (67%) 0–2 +0.02
20 1979 1753 143.1 -3 -222 -184 42.5% -0.05 2–7 (22%) 1–4 (20%) 92.8 -0.85
21 1980 1775 142.4 -13 -189 48.6% -0.01 4–5 (44%) 6–6 (50%) 101.2 -1.56
22 1976 1497 98.4 60.0% -0.20 0–1 1–0 +0.09 1981 1696 121.6 +33 -201 40.3% -1.19 3–7 (30%) 3–1 (75%) 97.8 +0.05
23 1977 1468 92.6 +55 30.0% -1.30 1–1 0–2 +0.80 1982 1542 96.6 +49 -85 +26 27.9% -1.70 3–4 (43%) 1–2 (33%) 99.4 +0.55
24 1978 1529 110.5 +90 60.0% +0.47 2–1 (67%) 0–2 +0.66 1983 1519 103.3 +70 +32 37.5% -0.81 0–2 0–1 +0.45
25 1979 1522 100.3 +38 42.9% -0.22 2–0 1–1 +1.09 1984 1512 99.5 33.3% -2.67 0–1 -0.14
26 1980 1530 93.2 +86 39.5% -1.05 6–3 (67%) 2–3 (40%) 102.9 +0.82 1985 1480 92.2 0.0% -3.25 +0.25
27 1981 1645 121.7 -135 +159 52.2% -0.22 4–2 (67%) 1–0 +0.70
28 1982 1634 121.9 -162 +124 44.4% -0.58 3–4 (43%) 1–0 +0.14
29 1983 1584 95.2 0.0% -3.00 +0.36
Career 1686 111.6 -150 +38 +121 45.1% -0.57 18–12 (60%) 6–8 (43%) 103.5 +5.90 1855 135.3 +9 -148 -86 44.5% -0.36 16–30 (35%) 11–19 (37%) 92.2 +0.20

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.