H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Janet Haas vs S Farrell H2H: 1-0

Janet Haas holds a 1–0 lead over S Farrell in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Janet Haas leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Janet Haas won the 1980 Dublin round of 32 6-1 6-1.

H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Janet Haas 6-1 6-1 S Farrell Match data Jul 10, 1980* R32 Dublin WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Janet Haas — — — 1,622 30 43 41.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0
S Farrell — — — 1,500 0 1 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Janet Haas S Farrell
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1972 6–7 46.2% — 1,516 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,483 0 0
1973 9–13 40.9% — 1,567 0 0 — — — — — — —
1974 9–15 37.5% — 1,524 0 0 — — — — — — —
1975 4–7 36.4% — 1,487 0 0 — — — — — — —
1980 2–1 66.7% — 1,505 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Janet Haas S Farrell
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
1972 — — — — 5 5 10 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1980 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
1973 0 1 1 0.0% 7 10 17 41.2% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1974 0 1 1 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1975 — — — — 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1980 — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 0 2 2 0.0% 22 27 49 44.9% 5 9 14 35.7% 2 2 4 50.0% Career — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Janet Haas S Farrell
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1972 1516 107.8 — — — — — +19 +19 42.3% -0.61 1–1 0–1 — +1.07 1980 1483 93.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +0.10
1973 1568 116.9 — — — — — +4 -23 43.5% -0.72 2–2 (50%) 2–0 — +0.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1974 1524 110.3 — — — — +16 +3 +20 40.0% -0.76 2–2 (50%) — — +1.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1975 1487 101.2 — — — — — +23 — 30.4% -1.48 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) 102.5 +0.75 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1980 1506 104.8 — — — — — +17 — 66.7% +1.50 — — — +0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1622 112.6 — — — — +16 +10 +7 41.1% -0.74 7–6 (54%) 4–2 (67%) 103.4 +7.16 Career 1500 96.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.00 — — — +10.00

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.