Janet Lee
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joannette Kruger | 0 | 3 | 3 | Oct 4, 2001 | H2H |
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 0 | 3 | 3 | Sep 28, 2001 | H2H |
| Amy Frazier | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 29, 2001 | H2H |
| Amanda Coetzer | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jul 27, 2000 | H2H |
| Anke Huber | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 21, 1998 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Janet Lee vs Flora Perfetti H2H: 0-1
Flora Perfetti holds a 1–0 lead over Janet Lee in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Flora Perfetti leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Flora Perfetti won the 1995 Palermo round of 16 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
1
1 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Flora Perfetti | 6-2 6-3 | Janet Lee | Match data | Jul 14, 1995* | R16 | Palermo | Tier IV → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Clay |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Lee | #863 | #79 | 390 | 1,570 | 31 | 67 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Flora Perfetti | #415 | #54 | 419 | 1,600 | 31 | 59 | 34.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janet Lee | Flora Perfetti | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #547 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #270 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #169 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #86 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #117 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #108 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #111 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #315 | 1,435 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #217 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #162 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #120 | 1,458 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #69 | 1,563 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #694 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #102 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #112 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #225 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Janet Lee | Flora Perfetti | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 1993 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1994 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2000 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1992 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2001 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 7 | 8 | 12.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2002 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2003 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 9 | 11 | 18.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 26 | 46 | 72 | 36.1% | 1 | 11 | 12 | 8.3% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | 7 | 13 | 20 | 35.0% | 21 | 39 | 60 | 35.0% | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Janet Lee | Flora Perfetti | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 1993 | 1492 | 98.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1994 | 1508 | 115.6 | — | — | — | — | +41 | — | — | 28.6% | -1.57 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 1519 | 101.0 | — | — | — | — | +57 | +14 | — | 28.6% | -2.14 | 1–0 | 3–0 (100%) | — | -0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 1514 | 120.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.48 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 1526 | 105.6 | — | — | — | — | +53 | — | — | 37.5% | -1.13 | 2–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 1499 | 121.5 | — | — | — | — | +38 | — | — | 30.0% | -1.10 | 0–6 (0%) | 1–3 (25%) | 92.7 | -0.18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 1488 | 111.5 | — | — | — | — | +57 | -62 | — | 38.2% | -0.50 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–1 | — | +0.61 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2000 | 1515 | 113.7 | — | — | — | — | +33 | — | — | 43.3% | -0.40 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.34 | 1992 | 1516 | 104.7 | — | — | — | — | — | +55 | — | 47.1% | -0.23 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–1 | — | +0.37 |
| 24 | 2001 | 1556 | 116.3 | — | — | — | — | +6 | — | — | 47.2% | +0.08 | 3–3 (50%) | 0–2 | — | +0.01 | 1993 | 1436 | 96.5 | — | — | — | — | — | +51 | — | 10.0% | -3.30 | — | 2–0 | — | +0.34 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1525 | 103.5 | — | — | — | — | +30 | — | — | 13.3% | -2.93 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | -0.90 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2003 | 1512 | 102.1 | -0.98 | -0.78 | 0.826 | 45.5% | — | — | +13 | 33.3% | -0.45 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.01 | 1995 | 1459 | 119.3 | — | — | — | — | — | +79 | — | 36.4% | -0.86 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.34 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 1564 | 117.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +56 | — | 51.1% | +0.23 | 5–4 (56%) | 3–2 (60%) | 103.7 | +0.60 |
| 28 | 2005 | 1496 | 98.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.09 | 1997 | 1556 | 120.2 | — | — | — | — | 0 | -28 | — | 38.5% | -0.77 | 2–6 (25%) | 2–2 (50%) | 97.9 | +0.32 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1525 | 112.3 | — | — | — | — | +36 | -42 | — | 37.5% | -1.25 | 1–3 (25%) | — | — | +0.80 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1491 | 94.9 | — | — | — | — | +50 | — | — | 30.0% | -1.60 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.65 |
| Career | — | 1571 | 119.1 | -0.98 | -0.78 | 0.826 | 45.5% | +36 | -24 | +13 | 34.3% | -1.01 | 10–16 (38%) | 7–12 (37%) | 93.8 | -0.59 | — | 1601 | 116.6 | — | — | — | — | +18 | +24 | — | 38.5% | -0.88 | 10–18 (36%) | 9–5 (64%) | 100.7 | +3.04 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Flora Perfetti
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| María Sánchez Lorenzo | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 6, 1998 | H2H |
| Lindsay Davenport | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jan 25, 1998 | H2H |
| Barbara Rittner | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jul 18, 1996 | H2H |
| Cristina Torrens Valero | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 31, 1998 | H2H |
| Katarina Studenikova | 2 | 0 | 2 | Jul 30, 1998 | H2H |