H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Janet Lee vs Kristine Kunce H2H: 0-1
Kristine Kunce holds a 1–0 lead over Janet Lee in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kristine Kunce leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Kristine Kunce won the 1995 Birmingham second round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Age 49
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 1995* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Kristine Kunce | 6-2 6-4 | Janet Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Lee | #863 | #79 | 390 | 1,560 | 31 | 67 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kristine Kunce | #572 | #45 | 205 | 1,765 | 46 | 63 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janet Lee | Kristine Kunce | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #547 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #270 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #169 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #242 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #168 | 1,557 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #279 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #86 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #172 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #177 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #117 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 8–8 | 50.0% | #96 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #111 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 19–17 | 52.8% | #56 | 1,714 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #217 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #221 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #162 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #170 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #121 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #694 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #260 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |