H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Janet Lee vs Miho Saeki H2H: 2-0

Janet Lee holds a 2–0 lead over Miho Saeki in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Janet Lee leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Janet Lee won the 1997 US Open round of 128 6-3 6-7 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Janet Lee

TPE Age 49 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H

2 – 0

2 main-draw meetings

Miho Saeki

JPN Age 50 Right-Handed 168 cm / 5'6"

H2H Match Log

Player	Score	Player	Match Data	Date	Round	Tournament	Category	Surface
Janet Lee #121	6-3 6-7 6-3	Miho Saeki #88	Match data	Aug 27, 1997*	R128	US Open	Grand Slam	Hard
Janet Lee #153	6-3 6-1	Miho Saeki #106	Match data	Apr 18, 1997*	R16	Japan Women's Open	Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250	Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player	Current	Peak	Pts	Elo	W	L	Win %	GS	1000 including documented historical predecessor categories	Finals	500 including documented historical predecessor categories	250 including documented historical predecessor categories	Titles
Janet Lee	#863	#79	390	1,570	31	67	31.6%	0	0	0	0	0	0
Miho Saeki	#884	#56	461	1,579	26	57	31.3%	0	0	0	0	0	0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age	Janet Lee							Miho Saeki
Age	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles	Yr	W-L	Win %	Rank	Elo	GS	Titles
16	1993	0–1	0.0%	#547	1,491	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	1994	1–2	33.3%	#270	1,508	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1995	4–7	36.4%	#169	1,519	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1996	0–2	0.0%	#175	1,513	0	0	1995	0–2	0.0%	#234	1,480	0	0
20	1997	3–4	42.9%	#114	1,525	0	0	1996	3–7	30.0%	#120	1,487	0	0
21	1998	4–14	22.2%	#86	1,498	0	0	1997	5–12	29.4%	#76	1,488	0	0
22	1999	5–10	33.3%	#95	1,487	0	0	1998	9–15	37.5%	#89	1,512	0	0
23	2000	5–8	38.5%	#117	1,514	0	0	1999	6–11	35.3%	#119	1,525	0	0
24	2001	7–9	43.8%	#111	1,555	0	0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	2002	1–6	14.3%	#217	1,524	0	0	2001	0–2	0.0%	#179	1,500	0	0
26	2003	1–3	25.0%	#162	1,511	0	0	2002	2–4	33.3%	#201	1,499	0	0
27	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2003	0–2	0.0%	#256	1,473	0	0
28	2005	0–1	0.0%	#694	1,495	0	0	2004	1–1	50.0%	#260	1,489	0	0
29	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2005	0–1	0.0%	#210	1,472	0	0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age	Janet Lee																	Miho Saeki
	Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet				Yr	Hard				Clay				Grass				Carpet
	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	Yr	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %	W	L	M	Win %
16	1993	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	1994	1	2	3	33.3%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1995	3	3	6	50.0%	1	3	4	25.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1996	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1995	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%
20	1997	3	3	6	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	1996	3	7	10	30.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
21	1998	3	10	13	23.1%	0	2	2	0.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	1997	5	9	14	35.7%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—
22	1999	4	5	9	44.4%	0	4	4	0.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	1998	5	10	15	33.3%	2	2	4	50.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	2	1	3	66.7%
23	2000	5	7	12	41.7%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	1999	5	7	12	41.7%	0	2	2	0.0%	1	1	2	50.0%	0	1	1	0.0%
24	2001	6	8	14	42.9%	—	—	—	—	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	2002	1	3	4	25.0%	0	1	1	0.0%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	2001	0	2	2	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
26	2003	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	1	2	3	33.3%	—	—	—	—	2002	2	3	5	40.0%	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—
27	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2003	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%
28	2005	0	1	1	0.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2004	1	1	2	50.0%	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
29	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2005	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0	1	1	0.0%
Career	—	26	46	72	36.1%	1	11	12	8.3%	4	8	12	33.3%	0	2	2	0.0%	—	21	41	62	33.9%	2	5	7	28.6%	1	6	7	14.3%	2	5	7	28.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age	Janet Lee																Miho Saeki
Age	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule	Yr	Elo	P+	Serve+	Return+	PD	TPW%	Hard Elo	Clay Elo	Grass Elo	Set Win %	Set Margin	Dec. Set	Tiebreak	Pressure+	Schedule
16	1993	1492	98.2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-5.00	—	—	—	+0.01	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
17	1994	1508	115.6	—	—	—	—	+41	—	—	28.6%	-1.57	1–0	—	—	-0.45	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
18	1995	1519	101.0	—	—	—	—	+57	+14	—	28.6%	-2.14	1–0	3–0 (100%)	—	-0.04	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
19	1996	1514	120.7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-3.00	—	0–1	—	-0.48	1995	1480	98.5	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-3.50	—	—	—	-0.09
20	1997	1526	105.6	—	—	—	—	+53	—	—	37.5%	-1.13	2–0	0–1	—	+0.41	1996	1487	103.2	—	—	—	—	+21	—	—	31.8%	-1.59	1–1	2–0	—	+0.13
21	1998	1499	121.5	—	—	—	—	+38	—	—	30.0%	-1.10	0–6 (0%)	1–3 (25%)	92.7	-0.18	1997	1489	122.4	—	—	—	—	+41	—	—	38.1%	-0.95	2–6 (25%)	4–4 (50%)	98.6	+0.43
22	1999	1488	111.5	—	—	—	—	+57	-62	—	38.2%	-0.50	1–3 (25%)	1–1	—	+0.61	1998	1513	115.8	—	—	—	—	+31	+52	—	39.3%	-0.88	3–5 (38%)	3–4 (43%)	98.6	+0.99
23	2000	1515	113.7	—	—	—	—	+33	—	—	43.3%	-0.40	1–3 (25%)	1–2 (33%)	—	+0.34	1999	1525	118.8	—	—	—	—	+30	—	—	42.5%	-0.47	1–5 (17%)	3–1 (75%)	99.7	+0.08
24	2001	1556	116.3	—	—	—	—	+6	—	—	47.2%	+0.08	3–3 (50%)	0–2	—	+0.01	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—
25	2002	1525	103.5	—	—	—	—	+30	—	—	13.3%	-2.93	1–0	1–1	—	-0.90	2001	1500	98.0	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	33.3%	-0.67	0–2	0–1	—	+0.22
26	2003	1512	102.1	-0.98	-0.78	0.826	45.5%	—	—	+13	33.3%	-0.45	0–1	0–1	—	+0.01	2002	1500	91.2	—	—	—	—	+3	—	—	30.8%	-1.39	1–0	0–3 (0%)	—	-0.20
27	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2003	1474	98.3	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	20.0%	-2.20	0–1	—	—	-0.02
28	2005	1496	98.2	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-2.50	—	—	—	+0.09	2004	1489	102.8	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	40.0%	-1.20	1–0	1–0	—	-0.17
29	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	2005	1472	89.7	—	—	—	—	—	—	—	0.0%	-5.50	—	—	—	+0.25
Career	—	1571	119.1	-0.98	-0.78	0.826	45.5%	+36	-24	+13	34.3%	-1.01	10–16 (38%)	7–12 (37%)	93.8	-0.59	—	1580	114.0	—	—	—	—	+29	+52	—	36.4%	-1.06	9–20 (31%)	13–13 (50%)	95.9	+1.95

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.

Janet Lee's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Joannette Kruger	3	3	Oct 4, 2001	H2H
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario	3	3	Sep 28, 2001	H2H
Amy Frazier	3	3	Jun 29, 2001	H2H
Amanda Coetzer	3	3	Jul 27, 2000	H2H
Anke Huber	3	3	Mar 21, 1998	H2H

Miho Saeki's most-played WTA rivals
Opponent	W	L	M	Last Played	H2H
Magui Serna	2	2	4	Mar 10, 1999	H2H
Jill Craybas	1	2	3	Oct 3, 2002	H2H
Els Callens	0	2	2	Oct 30, 2003	H2H
Tatiana Panova	1	1	2	Sep 23, 1999	H2H
Kimberly Po Messerli	0	2	2	Apr 15, 1999	H2H