H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Janet Lee vs Naoko Kijimuta H2H: 1-1

Janet Lee and Naoko Kijimuta are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Janet Lee won the 1998 Key Biscayne round of 128 6-1 6-4.

TPE Age 49 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 1
2 main-draw meetings
JPN Age 54 Right-Handed 164 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Janet Lee #91 6-1 6-4 Naoko Kijimuta #75 Match data Mar 20, 1998* R128 Key Biscayne Tier I modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Naoko Kijimuta #62 6-1 6-3 Janet Lee #127 Match data Apr 25, 1997* R32 Jakarta Tier IV modern equivalent WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Janet Lee #863 #79 390 1,570 31 67 31.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Naoko Kijimuta #538 #44 529 1,696 37 57 39.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Janet Lee Naoko Kijimuta
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1993 0–1 0.0% #547 1,491 0 0
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #270 1,508 0 0 1989 1–1 50.0% 1,513 0 0
18 1995 4–7 36.4% #169 1,519 0 0
19 1996 0–2 0.0% #175 1,513 0 0
20 1997 3–4 42.9% #114 1,525 0 0 1992 0–1 0.0% #315 1,496 0 0
21 1998 4–14 22.2% #86 1,498 0 0 1993 0–1 0.0% #303 1,490 0 0
22 1999 5–10 33.3% #95 1,487 0 0 1994 2–7 22.2% #156 1,480 0 0
23 2000 5–8 38.5% #117 1,514 0 0 1995 6–6 50.0% #87 1,556 0 0
24 2001 7–9 43.8% #111 1,555 0 0 1996 17–18 48.6% #45 1,682 0 0
25 2002 1–6 14.3% #217 1,524 0 0 1997 10–17 37.0% #74 1,669 0 0
26 2003 1–3 25.0% #162 1,511 0 0 1998 1–6 14.3% #279 1,595 0 0
28 2005 0–1 0.0% #694 1,495 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Janet Lee Naoko Kijimuta
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1993 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1994 1 2 3 33.3% 1989 1 1 2 50.0%
18 1995 3 3 6 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1996 0 2 2 0.0%
20 1997 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1998 3 10 13 23.1% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1993 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1999 4 5 9 44.4% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 2 7 9 22.2%
23 2000 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 6 5 11 54.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2001 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 14 11 25 56.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 2002 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1997 4 12 16 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2003 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1998 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
28 2005 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 26 46 72 36.1% 1 11 12 8.3% 4 8 12 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 26 40 66 39.4% 6 6 12 50.0% 4 6 10 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Janet Lee Naoko Kijimuta
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1993 1492 98.2 0.0% -5.00 +0.01
17 1994 1508 115.6 +41 28.6% -1.57 1–0 -0.45 1989 1514 104.0 50.0% -0.25 +0.25
18 1995 1519 101.0 +57 +14 28.6% -2.14 1–0 3–0 (100%) -0.04
19 1996 1514 120.7 0.0% -3.00 0–1 -0.48
20 1997 1526 105.6 +53 37.5% -1.13 2–0 0–1 +0.41 1992 1497 99.7 33.3% -0.33 0–1 +0.21
21 1998 1499 121.5 +38 30.0% -1.10 0–6 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 92.7 -0.18 1993 1490 103.7 33.3% -1.67 0–1 0.00
22 1999 1488 111.5 +57 -62 38.2% -0.50 1–3 (25%) 1–1 +0.61 1994 1480 119.3 +27 25.0% -1.40 1–1 1–2 (33%) -0.38
23 2000 1515 113.7 +33 43.3% -0.40 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) +0.34 1995 1556 125.1 +18 48.3% +0.31 3–2 (60%) 0–2 +0.31
24 2001 1556 116.3 +6 47.2% +0.08 3–3 (50%) 0–2 +0.01 1996 1682 139.7 +22 -92 -129 50.0% +0.20 5–7 (42%) 3–4 (43%) 100.8 -0.53
25 2002 1525 103.5 +30 13.3% -2.93 1–0 1–1 -0.90 1997 1670 130.1 -56 -37 -27 40.9% -0.74 5–7 (42%) 1–3 (25%) 99.4 -1.71
26 2003 1512 102.1 -0.98 -0.78 0.826 45.5% +13 33.3% -0.45 0–1 0–1 +0.01 1998 1595 103.6 -39 27.8% -2.11 1–3 (25%) +0.31
28 2005 1496 98.2 0.0% -2.50 +0.09
Career 1571 119.1 -0.98 -0.78 0.826 45.5% +36 -24 +13 34.3% -1.01 10–16 (38%) 7–12 (37%) 93.8 -0.59 1697 134.7 -1 -67 -65 42.7% -0.43 15–22 (41%) 5–11 (31%) 96.6 -1.64

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.