Janet Lee
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Joannette Kruger | 0 | 3 | 3 | Oct 4, 2001 | H2H |
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 0 | 3 | 3 | Sep 28, 2001 | H2H |
| Amy Frazier | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 29, 2001 | H2H |
| Amanda Coetzer | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jul 27, 2000 | H2H |
| Anke Huber | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 21, 1998 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC
Janet Lee vs Samantha Reeves H2H: 2-0
Janet Lee holds a 2–0 lead over Samantha Reeves in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Janet Lee leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Janet Lee won the 1999 Japan Women's Open round of 32 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
2
–
0
2 main-draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Lee | 6-2 6-2 | Samantha Reeves | Match data | Apr 15, 1999* | R32 | Japan Women's Open | Tier III → modern equivalent WTA 250 | Hard |
| Janet Lee | 7-5 6-1 | Samantha Reeves | Match data | Jan 22, 1999* | R64 | Australian Open | Grand Slam | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Lee | #863 | #79 | 390 | 1,570 | 31 | 67 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Samantha Reeves | #864 | #62 | 523 | 1,629 | 30 | 59 | 33.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janet Lee | Samantha Reeves | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #547 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #270 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #169 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #111 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,525 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #121 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #86 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #171 | 1,446 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,487 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 4–3 | 57.1% | #106 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #117 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #108 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #111 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 8–10 | 44.4% | #74 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #217 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #198 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #162 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #694 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Janet Lee | Samantha Reeves | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | 1993 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1994 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 20 | 1997 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 21 | 1998 | 3 | 10 | 13 | 23.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2000 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 23 | 2000 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2002 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 24 | 2001 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 25 | 2002 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 1 | 5 | 6 | 16.7% | 2 | 6 | 8 | 25.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2003 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 26 | 46 | 72 | 36.1% | 1 | 11 | 12 | 8.3% | 4 | 8 | 12 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | 14 | 27 | 41 | 34.1% | 11 | 22 | 33 | 33.3% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Janet Lee | Samantha Reeves | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | 1993 | 1492 | 98.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -5.00 | — | — | — | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1994 | 1508 | 115.6 | — | — | — | — | +41 | — | — | 28.6% | -1.57 | 1–0 | — | — | -0.45 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 1519 | 101.0 | — | — | — | — | +57 | +14 | — | 28.6% | -2.14 | 1–0 | 3–0 (100%) | — | -0.04 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 1514 | 120.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.48 | 1998 | 1480 | 114.3 | — | — | — | — | +27 | +68 | — | 29.2% | -1.17 | 1–3 (25%) | 0–2 | — | -0.17 |
| 20 | 1997 | 1526 | 105.6 | — | — | — | — | +53 | — | — | 37.5% | -1.13 | 2–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.41 | 1999 | 1481 | 106.1 | — | — | — | — | +28 | +49 | — | 34.6% | -1.65 | 1–1 | 1–0 | — | +0.52 |
| 21 | 1998 | 1499 | 121.5 | — | — | — | — | +38 | — | — | 30.0% | -1.10 | 0–6 (0%) | 1–3 (25%) | 92.7 | -0.18 | 2000 | 1447 | 92.1 | — | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | 18.2% | -1.45 | 1–0 | 0–1 | — | +0.50 |
| 22 | 1999 | 1488 | 111.5 | — | — | — | — | +57 | -62 | — | 38.2% | -0.50 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–1 | — | +0.61 | 2001 | 1515 | 113.3 | — | — | — | — | +30 | — | — | 47.1% | +0.12 | 3–0 (100%) | 1–0 | — | +0.29 |
| 23 | 2000 | 1515 | 113.7 | — | — | — | — | +33 | — | — | 43.3% | -0.40 | 1–3 (25%) | 1–2 (33%) | — | +0.34 | 2002 | 1545 | 121.7 | — | — | — | — | +16 | -68 | — | 42.6% | -0.48 | 3–7 (30%) | 4–5 (44%) | 96.7 | -0.91 |
| 24 | 2001 | 1556 | 116.3 | — | — | — | — | +6 | — | — | 47.2% | +0.08 | 3–3 (50%) | 0–2 | — | +0.01 | 2003 | 1589 | 112.2 | -1.00 | +0.72 | 0.861 | 46.5% | -29 | -69 | +14 | 41.0% | -0.92 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–0 | — | -0.54 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1525 | 103.5 | — | — | — | — | +30 | — | — | 13.3% | -2.93 | 1–0 | 1–1 | — | -0.90 | 2004 | 1526 | 110.0 | -3.84 | -1.12 | 0.609 | 38.9% | -9 | -32 | — | 24.2% | -1.70 | 3–2 (60%) | 0–1 | — | -0.74 |
| 26 | 2003 | 1512 | 102.1 | -0.98 | -0.78 | 0.826 | 45.5% | — | — | +13 | 33.3% | -0.45 | 0–1 | 0–1 | — | +0.01 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 1496 | 98.2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.09 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1571 | 119.1 | -0.98 | -0.78 | 0.826 | 45.5% | +36 | -24 | +13 | 34.3% | -1.01 | 10–16 (38%) | 7–12 (37%) | 93.8 | -0.59 | — | 1630 | 116.7 | -2.07 | +0.03 | 0.755 | 43.6% | +12 | -24 | +14 | 35.8% | -0.99 | 15–15 (50%) | 8–9 (47%) | 103.4 | -1.18 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Samantha Reeves
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kim Clijsters | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jun 29, 2003 | H2H |
| Fabiola Zuluaga | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 27, 2003 | H2H |
| Anna Smashnova | 2 | 1 | 3 | Jun 25, 2003 | H2H |
| Elena Bovina | 0 | 3 | 3 | Mar 5, 2003 | H2H |
| Lilia Osterloh | 2 | 1 | 3 | Sep 13, 2002 | H2H |