H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Janet Lee vs Yayuk Basuki H2H: 1-1
Janet Lee and Yayuk Basuki are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Janet Lee won the 2000 Japan Open third round 4-6 6-3 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
TPE
Age 49
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
INA
Age 55
Right-Handed
164 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2000* | Japan Open | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Janet Lee | 4-6 6-3 6-2 | Yayuk Basuki | Match data |
| Apr 12, 1996* | Jakarta | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Yayuk Basuki | 6-4 7-6 | Janet Lee | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Lee | #863 | #79 | 390 | 1,560 | 31 | 67 | 31.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Yayuk Basuki | #262 | #19 | 1,360 | 1,940 | 161 | 123 | 56.7% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janet Lee | Yayuk Basuki | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #547 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #270 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #169 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #175 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #114 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #35 | 1,678 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1998 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #86 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #48 | 1,700 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1999 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #95 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #43 | 1,723 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 2000 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #117 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 23–12 | 65.7% | #29 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2001 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #111 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 18–12 | 60.0% | #24 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #217 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 22–16 | 57.9% | #30 | 1,853 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2003 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #162 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #20 | 1,854 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #56 | 1,727 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #694 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #241 | 1,707 | 0 | 6 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #256 | 1,660 | 0 | 6 |