H2H data updated: 2026-09-12 00:00 UTC

Janet Young vs Kate Latham H2H: 0-1

Kate Latham holds a 1–0 lead over Janet Young in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kate Latham leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kate Latham won the 1974 Costa Mesa quarterfinal 7-5 3-6 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Janet Young
AUS Age 74
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Kate Latham
USA Age 73

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kate Latham 7-5 3-6 7-5 Janet Young Match data Apr 6, 1974* QF Costa Mesa WTA 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Janet Young — — — 1,795 80 85 48.5% 0 0 0 2 0 2
Kate Latham — — — 1,864 198 202 49.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Janet Young Kate Latham
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1968 0–2 0.0% — 1,468 0 0 1969 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
17 1969 17–27 38.6% — 1,530 0 0 1970 1–3 25.0% — 1,475 0 0
18 1970 4–4 50.0% — 1,556 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1971 2–4 33.3% — 1,537 0 0 1972 3–3 50.0% — 1,502 0 0
20 1972 13–11 54.2% — 1,625 0 0 1973 6–7 46.2% — 1,587 0 0
21 1973 28–22 56.0% — 1,783 0 2 1974 40–16 71.4% — 1,828 0 3
22 1974 13–11 54.2% — 1,741 0 2 1975 15–20 42.9% — 1,684 0 3
23 1975 0–1 0.0% — 1,720 0 2 1976 4–2 66.7% — 1,676 0 3
24 1976 2–2 50.0% — 1,708 0 2 1977 15–12 55.6% — 1,748 0 3
25 1977 1–1 50.0% — 1,720 0 2 1978 13–17 43.3% — 1,660 0 3
26 — — — — — — — 1979 21–23 47.7% — 1,852 0 3
27 — — — — — — — 1980 23–22 51.1% — 1,748 0 4
28 — — — — — — — 1981 21–20 51.2% — 1,774 0 5
29 — — — — — — — 1982 24–28 46.2% — 1,684 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1983 9–16 36.0% — 1,623 0 6
31 — — — — — — — 1984 0–11 0.0% — 1,492 0 6
32 — — — — — — — 1985 3–1 75.0% — 1,526 0 6

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Janet Young Kate Latham
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1968 — — — — — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1969 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1969 3 5 8 37.5% 9 10 19 47.4% 5 12 17 29.4% — — — — 1970 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1970 — — — — — — — — 4 4 8 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 — — — — — — — — 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 1972 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1972 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 12 10 22 54.5% — — — — 1973 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% — — — —
21 1973 1 1 2 50.0% 9 12 21 42.9% 18 8 26 69.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 1974 15 5 20 75.0% 8 2 10 80.0% 17 6 23 73.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
22 1974 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — 1975 3 5 8 37.5% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 5 5 0.0%
23 1975 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1976 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
24 1976 — — — — — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1977 4 4 8 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1977 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1978 1 3 4 25.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 6 11 45.5%
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 8 7 15 53.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 6 10 16 37.5%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 9 8 17 52.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 9 12 25.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 8 7 15 53.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 6 10 16 37.5%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 9 7 16 56.3% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 7 12 41.7% 7 9 16 43.8%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 6 8 14 42.9% 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
Career — 6 8 14 42.9% 20 24 44 45.5% 51 51 102 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — 70 67 137 51.1% 26 38 64 40.6% 41 33 74 55.4% 27 55 82 32.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Janet Young Kate Latham
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1968 1469 96.8 — — — — — — — 20.0% -1.80 0–1 — — +0.21 1969 1489 99.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.07
17 1969 1530 106.5 — — — — -36 +32 -75 37.4% -1.10 3–4 (43%) — — -0.19 1970 1476 93.6 — — — — +10 — — 25.0% -2.63 — — — +0.42
18 1970 1556 111.7 — — — — — — -44 50.0% +0.44 — — — +0.69 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1971 1538 104.2 — — — — — — -35 35.7% -0.93 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.46 1972 1503 99.9 — — — — — +39 — 45.5% -0.54 0–1 — — +0.62
20 1972 1625 132.4 — — — — — — +19 55.6% +0.81 2–4 (33%) 1–1 — +1.79 1973 1587 129.0 — — — — -41 — 0 48.3% +0.14 1–2 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.26
21 1973 1783 135.5 — — — — -236 -217 +110 54.5% +0.46 10–6 (63%) 2–4 (33%) 102.9 +0.41 1974 1828 140.0 — — — — -65 -181 -31 68.9% +1.55 6–8 (43%) 4–4 (50%) 99.0 +3.26
22 1974 1742 124.7 — — — — -200 — +86 56.1% +0.72 5–6 (45%) 0–2 — +1.16 1975 1685 132.9 — — — — +12 -76 — 45.3% -0.03 1–4 (20%) 1–7 (13%) 89.6 -0.75
23 1975 1720 94.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — +0.16 1976 1676 107.6 — — — — +22 — — 57.1% +1.00 2–0 1–0 — +2.30
24 1976 1708 101.7 — — — — — — +73 50.0% -0.10 1–1 — — +0.79 1977 1749 140.9 — — — — -7 -119 — 54.2% +0.34 3–4 (43%) 4–1 (80%) 103.9 -0.90
25 1977 1720 109.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.00 1–0 0–1 — -0.23 1978 1661 118.3 — — — — +8 -10 +69 43.3% -0.58 6–3 (67%) 4–2 (67%) 105.3 +2.03
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1979 1852 149.5 — — — — -20 -164 -96 45.5% -0.29 8–7 (53%) 4–4 (50%) 102.4 -2.22
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1980 1749 133.1 — — — — -30 — +16 51.5% +0.05 5–10 (33%) 7–4 (64%) 96.7 -1.81
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1774 142.7 — — — — -17 — +6 52.1% +0.14 5–7 (42%) 6–5 (55%) 97.1 -1.96
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1982 1685 128.0 — — — — +51 -102 +34 44.5% -0.56 10–5 (67%) 5–2 (71%) 106.2 -0.31
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1983 1624 115.0 — — — — +51 -49 +71 40.3% -0.61 7–9 (44%) 3–6 (33%) 96.8 +0.84
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1984 1492 91.5 — — — — +52 +30 — 8.3% -3.08 0–2 0–1 — +0.50
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1527 102.8 — — — — — — — 60.0% +0.40 2–0 1–0 — +0.05
Career — 1796 125.9 — — — — -120 -99 +30 48.6% +0.01 23–23 (50%) 4–10 (29%) 96.2 +3.24 — 1864 138.0 — — — — -3 -77 -8 49.1% -0.03 56–62 (47%) 41–38 (52%) 100.8 +0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.