H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Janet Young vs Nancy Richey H2H: 1-0
Janet Young holds a 1–0 lead over Nancy Richey in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Janet Young leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Janet Young won the 1969 Durban third round W/O.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Age 74
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 83
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 1969* | Durban | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Janet Young | (w/o) | Nancy Richey | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Young | — | — | — | 1,805 | 83 | 86 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Nancy Richey | — | — | — | 2,236 | 324 | 109 | 74.8% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 24 | 28 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janet Young | Nancy Richey | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1968 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1969 | 17–27 | 38.6% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1972 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1973 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,793 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1974 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1976 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | 1968 | 56–5 | 91.8% | — | 1,887 | 1 | 10 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1969 | 33–8 | 80.5% | — | 2,031 | 1 | 13 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 43–8 | 84.3% | — | 2,114 | 1 | 20 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 29–13 | 69.0% | — | 2,078 | 1 | 20 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1972 | 45–12 | 78.9% | — | 2,128 | 1 | 25 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 34–13 | 72.3% | — | 2,162 | 1 | 25 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 25–13 | 65.8% | — | 2,057 | 1 | 25 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 24–11 | 68.6% | — | 2,080 | 1 | 26 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 14–10 | 58.3% | — | 2,034 | 1 | 26 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 15–7 | 68.2% | — | 1,983 | 1 | 28 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 6–9 | 40.0% | — | 1,902 | 1 | 28 |