H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Janet Young vs Patricia Bostrom H2H: 2-0
Janet Young holds a 2–0 lead over Patricia Bostrom in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Janet Young leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Janet Young won the 1973 Miami Beach second round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 1973* | Miami Beach | WTA 250 | R64 | Clay | Janet Young | 6-3 6-1 | Patricia Bostrom | Match data |
| Jan 20, 1973* | Christchurch | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Janet Young | 3-6 6-2 6-3 | Patricia Bostrom | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Young | — | — | — | 1,805 | 83 | 86 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Patricia Bostrom | — | — | — | 1,685 | 57 | 88 | 39.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janet Young | Patricia Bostrom | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1968 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1969 | 17–27 | 38.6% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | 1969 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1970 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 1970 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1971 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1971 | 0–4 | 0.0% | — | 1,452 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1972 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | 1972 | 7–7 | 50.0% | — | 1,499 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1973 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,793 | 0 | 2 | 1973 | 16–23 | 41.0% | — | 1,598 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1974 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 1974 | 12–10 | 54.5% | — | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | 1975 | 5–6 | 45.5% | — | 1,632 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1976 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 1976 | 4–7 | 36.4% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | 1977 | 8–9 | 47.1% | — | 1,633 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 3–16 | 15.8% | — | 1,523 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,511 | 0 | 1 |