H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Janet Young vs Winnie Shaw H2H: 1-3
Winnie Shaw holds a 3–1 lead over Janet Young in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Winnie Shaw leads 3–0 on grass, while Janet Young leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Winnie Shaw won the 1971 Australian Open third round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 1971* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Winnie Shaw | 6-1 6-0 | Janet Young | Match data |
| Jan 29, 1971* | Melbourne | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Winnie Shaw | 6-1 6-3 | Janet Young | Match data |
| Jan 9, 1970* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Winnie Shaw | 7-5 6-4 | Janet Young | Match data |
| Nov 22, 1969* | Rockdale | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Janet Young | 6-2 0-6 6-3 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janet Young | — | — | — | 1,805 | 83 | 86 | 49.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Winnie Shaw | — | — | — | 1,991 | 296 | 144 | 67.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Janet Young | Winnie Shaw | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1968 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1969 | 17–27 | 38.6% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1970 | 5–5 | 50.0% | — | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1971 | 2–4 | 33.3% | — | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1972 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,628 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1973 | 30–22 | 57.7% | — | 1,793 | 0 | 2 | 1968 | 49–28 | 63.6% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1974 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,720 | 0 | 2 | 1969 | 69–27 | 71.9% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1975 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,700 | 0 | 2 | 1970 | 55–26 | 67.9% | — | 1,941 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1976 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,690 | 0 | 2 | 1971 | 46–26 | 63.9% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1977 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,703 | 0 | 2 | 1972 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,858 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1973 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 12–5 | 70.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 14 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 14 |