H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Natalia Baudone holds a 1–0 lead over Janette Husarova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Natalia Baudone leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Natalia Baudone won the 1996 Wimbledon round of 128 0-6 6-1 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Natalia Baudone | 0-6 6-1 6-1 | Janette Husarova | Match data | Jun 26, 1996* | R128 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Janette Husarova | #1,055 | #31 | 1,006 | 1,737 | 79 | 109 | 42.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Natalia Baudone | #934 | #71 | 126 | 1,682 | 38 | 58 | 39.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Janette Husarova | Natalia Baudone | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1993 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #82 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #224 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #145 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #179 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #102 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #101 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 12–14 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #97 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #375 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 8–9 | 47.1% | #96 | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #127 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #216 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #177 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #149 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #72 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #33 | 1,716 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #126 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #366 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Janette Husarova | Natalia Baudone | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | ||
| 1993 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | 1990 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1994 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 2 | 5 | 7 | 28.6% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 1991 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1995 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1992 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% |
| 1996 | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | 8 | 8 | 16 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% |
| 1997 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 1998 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 33.3% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 5 | 7 | 12 | 41.7% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 1999 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 6 | 8 | 14 | 42.9% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 17 | 15 | 32 | 53.1% | 9 | 7 | 16 | 56.3% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 39 | 53 | 92 | 42.4% | 30 | 42 | 72 | 41.7% | 0 | 5 | 5 | 0.0% | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | Career | 21 | 29 | 50 | 42.0% | 13 | 21 | 34 | 38.2% | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% |
Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Janette Husarova | Natalia Baudone | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule |
| 1993 | 1547 | 100.6 | — | — | — | — | +34 | — | — | 75.0% | +0.38 | — | 1–0 | — | +0.39 | 1990 | 1502 | 102.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 60.0% | +0.80 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.23 |
| 1994 | 1508 | 103.9 | — | — | — | — | +39 | +46 | — | 32.6% | -1.23 | 3–2 (60%) | 0–3 (0%) | 98.6 | +1.20 | 1991 | 1465 | 96.6 | — | — | — | — | — | +22 | — | 20.0% | -2.20 | 0–2 | — | — | -0.01 |
| 1995 | 1477 | 101.2 | — | — | — | — | +49 | — | — | 23.1% | -1.92 | 0–1 | 1–0 | — | -0.05 | 1992 | 1538 | 120.3 | — | — | — | — | +12 | +28 | — | 44.4% | -0.67 | 2–2 (50%) | 1–1 | — | +0.42 |
| 1996 | 1545 | 112.8 | — | — | — | — | -4 | +37 | — | 51.7% | -0.07 | 2–6 (25%) | 2–3 (40%) | 96.0 | +1.72 | 1993 | 1578 | 121.3 | — | — | — | — | +3 | -7 | — | 41.5% | -0.89 | 6–5 (55%) | 5–4 (56%) | 105.4 | -0.23 |
| 1997 | 1542 | 102.2 | — | — | — | — | -3 | — | — | 60.0% | +1.00 | 0–1 | — | — | -0.04 | 1994 | 1650 | 135.6 | — | — | — | — | +10 | — | — | 48.7% | -0.31 | 2–3 (40%) | 1–4 (20%) | 98.8 | -0.82 |
| 1998 | 1525 | 112.1 | — | — | — | — | +6 | +37 | — | 36.4% | -1.00 | 3–2 (60%) | 2–2 (50%) | 103.2 | +0.35 | 1995 | 1662 | 125.1 | — | — | — | — | -4 | -56 | — | 45.7% | -0.43 | 1–5 (17%) | 0–3 (0%) | 92.4 | -0.25 |
| 1999 | 1502 | 104.4 | — | — | — | — | — | +26 | — | 0.0% | -3.50 | — | 0–1 | — | -0.55 | 1996 | 1626 | 108.7 | — | — | — | — | +22 | -80 | — | 30.4% | -1.70 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–0 | — | +0.04 |
| 2000 | 1490 | 103.1 | — | — | — | — | +10 | +53 | — | 42.9% | -0.57 | 2–3 (40%) | — | — | +0.68 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 1527 | 118.7 | — | — | — | — | +9 | +8 | — | 42.9% | -0.52 | 2–4 (33%) | 2–2 (50%) | 99.1 | +0.95 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2002 | 1717 | 138.8 | — | — | — | — | -46 | -61 | — | 53.0% | +0.11 | 10–5 (67%) | 4–3 (57%) | 107.9 | -2.46 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2003 | 1579 | 119.5 | -1.15 | -0.24 | 0.755 | 43.7% | +16 | +25 | — | 37.5% | -0.89 | 3–7 (30%) | 1–1 | — | +0.52 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2004 | 1590 | 109.9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 60.0% | -0.20 | 0–1 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2005 | 1605 | 111.1 | — | — | — | — | +9 | — | — | 100.0% | +4.25 | — | — | — | +0.07 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | 1737 | 124.3 | -1.15 | -0.24 | 0.755 | 43.7% | -4 | +11 | — | 44.9% | -0.45 | 25–32 (44%) | 15–16 (48%) | 100.2 | +1.54 | Career | 1682 | 127.5 | — | — | — | — | +6 | -15 | — | 42.4% | -0.76 | 13–19 (41%) | 8–12 (40%) | 97.6 | -0.65 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elena Likhovtseva | 0 | 7 | 7 | Apr 9, 2003 | H2H |
| Nathalie Dechy | 0 | 5 | 5 | Jun 25, 2003 | H2H |
| Ai Sugiyama | 2 | 2 | 4 | May 30, 2002 | H2H |
| Henrieta Nagyova | 0 | 4 | 4 | May 6, 1999 | H2H |
| Tamarine Tanasugarn | 1 | 2 | 3 | Feb 6, 2004 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karina Habsudova | 1 | 3 | 4 | May 11, 1995 | H2H |
| Sabine Appelmans | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jan 17, 1996 | H2H |
| Linda Wild | 1 | 2 | 3 | Apr 21, 1994 | H2H |
| Steffi Graf | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jun 28, 1996 | H2H |
| Patricia Hy Boulais | 1 | 1 | 2 | Aug 16, 1995 | H2H |